- Overview: Research Excellence Evaluation, Colin Steele, Emeritus Fellow, ANU.
- The Australian Research Council -ERA National Perspectives, Andrew Calder, Director, Research Performance and Analysis, ARC.
- The ANU Experience, John Wellard, Director ANU Research Office.
- Perverse and Beneficial Outcomes From Research Assessment, Professor Andrew Cockburn, Director, College of Medicine, Biology and Environment, ANU.
- Scholarly Publishing Economics: an International Research Perspective, Professor John Houghton, Victoria University.
- Future Publishing Metrics – The Way Forward?, Dr Danny Kingsley, Manager Scholarly Communications, ANU.
- Research Impact – the Wider Dimension, Dr Claire Donovan, Lecturer in Sociology, ANU.
Most of the "transcripts" are simply text, but Andrew Calder's "The Australian Research Council -ERA National Perspectives" is a set of slides. Here is a text version of the slides. Note that the FoR codes referred to are the Australian and New Zealand Standard Research Classification (ANZSRC) and "Scopus" is a list of journal articles and citations:
Excellence in Research for Australia
Andrew Calder
Director – Research Performance and Analysis
Australian Research Council
Australian Government
General ERA Principles
- Unit of Evaluation is the four‐digit ANZSRC Field of Research code (ie. 157 possible Units of Evaluation); evaluation occurs at the two‐digit level as well
- Evaluation by Research Evaluation Committees in discipline clusters; eight clusters in total
- There is a minimum level of output for a discipline to be considered ‘research active’ for evaluation in ERA
- Evaluations informed by a ‘dashboard ‘ of discipline‐specific indicators
- Some peer review of outputs accessed through institutional repositories in some clusters
ERA Process Overview
Metrics Profile 1 | Metrics Profile 2 |
Metrics Profile 3 | Metrics Profile 4 |
Metrics Profile 5 | Metrics Profile 6 |
Peer Review (if included) | |
↓
Research Evaluation Committee
↓
Final report
Note - There are no weightings!
Mythbusting ‐ Ranked Outlets
- Only one of a number of unweighted
- indicators on the “Dashboard”
- Ranked conferences are essential for ICT,
- Engineering & Built Environment
- Note discipline‐specific practices
Role of the ranked outlets list in ERA
- Ranked journals
- Ranked conferences
- FoR assignments
- Ranks used for ranked journal/conference profile
- FoR assignments used to derive discipline specific benchmarks for citation analysis
Developing the ranked journal list
Initial development by Learned Academies and Peak bodies
↓
Public consultation (June‐Aug 2008)
↓
Expert Review of the public feedback
↓
Omitted journal public feedback (Aug‐Nov 2009)
↓
Final expert review of consolidated list (Dec 2009 – Jan 2010)
Parameters for inclusion in the lists
- academic/scholarly
- publishes original research
- peer reviewed or equivalent process
- active during the ERA reference period (2003‐2008)
- has an ISSN
- able to withstand international scrutiny
The 2010 Ranked Outlet Lists
- The 2010 lists are fixed for this ERA evaluation
- ERA 2010 Ranked Journal List
- 20,712 journals included
- Over 88% agreement on ranks and FoR
- ERA 2010 Ranked Conference List
- 1,952 conferences included
ERA 2010
Background Statement
Volume and Activity |
|
|
---|---|---|
Ranked Outlets |
|
|
Citation Analysis |
|
|
Peer Review |
|
|
Esteem Measures |
|
|
Research Income |
|
|
Applied measures |
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment