Showing posts with label Open Access. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Open Access. Show all posts

Sunday, April 26, 2015

Digital Services for a New Economy in Canberra

The free event "Open Data and Digital Services: Foundations for a New Information Economy" by Open Knowledge Australia is at NICTA Canberra, 2:30 to 5:30pm, 13 May 2015.
"Hear from leading speakers covering subjects related to open data and digital Government service delivery.

Learn about the foundational elements of a new information economy that is already connecting public and private sectors throughout Australia and the world."

With:

Nicholas Gruen: Chair of Open Knowledge Australia
Jed Sundwall: Global Open Data Technical BDM for Amazon Web Services
Pia Waugh:  Director of Analytics and Discovery Layer, Digital Transformation Office
Steve Bennett: Community Contributor, Open Knowledge Australia
Steven De Costa: Open Knowledge Australia, CKAN Association and Link Digital

Drinks at 4:30pm.

Book at Eventbrite

ps: I will be discussing "Innovations in Teaching Innovation", 27 April 2015, 4pm, CSIRO seminar room in the ANU CSIT Building in Canberra: http://es.csiro.au/ir-and-friends/

Friday, July 26, 2013

Open Knowledge Down Under

Dr. Rufus Pollock, founder of the Open Knowledge Foundation will speak on open knowledge and open data, around Australia in August 2013: Sydney 27 August, Canberra 28 August, Brisbane 29 August, Adelaide 30 August, and Melbourne 2 September.
Dr. Rufus Pollock graduated from Cambridge University as a Mead fellow in Economics (after graduating with a distinction in mathematics). Rufus is a well regarded economist because of his scholarly and advisory work on open data and open knowledge economies. Rufus co-founded the Open Knowledge Foundation in 2004 and personally wrote the first lines of code for the CKAN data system (Rufus is also an accomplished programmer). Rufus has sat on several government advisory panels including the British Prime Minister’s appointed Public Sector Transparency Board. This involved working with Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who credited Rufus with starting the ‘Raw Data Now’ meme[1].

Currently, Rufus is a Shuttleworth fellow and is helping to expand the Open Knowledge Foundation worldwide, of which over 50+ chapters have formed including our Asia-Pacific neighbors: India, Nepal, Taiwan, China.

The objectives of this open knowledge tour include: Talk to government representatives about the idea of ‘open knowledge’ especially ‘open data’, ‘data journalism’ & other ‘open’ events and efforts. Launch the official OKFN Australian chapter.

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

Free Open Access to Australian Curriculum Materials

The Copyright Agency is offering free sessions on opportunities for publishers and creators with the new Australian Curriculum. However, it should be noted that the agency is not a government body devoted to the public interest, but is a non-government body with the aim of maximizing copyright revenue for its members. It is therefore unlikely that the Copyright Agency will be pointing out that the new Australian Curriculum is an ideal opportunity for the development of free open access content which schools, teachers ans students can use without paying any copyright or other fees.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

A Smarter Australia: An agenda for Australian higher education 2013-2016

Universities Australia today released "A Smarter Australia: An agenda for Australian higher education 2013-2016". This 80 page document details reforms proposed for Australia's universities. There is also the more provocatively titled four page summary document "A Smarter Australia: Policy advice for an Incoming Government 2013–2016", which implies Universities Australia does not believe the current Gillard government will be reelected.

Four trends are suggested as driving change in higher education:
  1. The digital economy and technology
  2. global higher education market
  3. Asian century
  4. many countries develop and expand their own world-class capacity
Four themes are proposed
  1. Increase Australians’ university participation
  2. Develop Australia’s globally engaged university sector
  3. A powerful research and innovation system that drives economic and social progress
  4. Efficiency, investment and regulation

Summary

To herald a new era in Australian higher education, Universities Australia, the peak body for 39 Australian universities, has developed A Smarter Australia: An agenda for higher education 2013–2016. In this statement we outline the reforms required to underpin the nation’s higher education system over the next four years, with a view to longer-term changes.
A Smarter Australia responds to four trends that are driving change in Australian higher education: the emergence of the digital economy and new technology; increasing globalisation and the possibilities of the Asian century; economic and industrial restructuring as the nation responds to the resources boom; and the need to improve productivity with universities central to the >national innovation effort. This statement sets out principles and actions for responding to these drivers under four themes.

Theme 1 Increase Australians’ university participation

To increase Australians’ opportunities to attend university, universities will:
  • broaden pathways into university degrees
  • respond to student demand and national and regional employment demand
  • evaluate and adjust partnership programs that support access to university for students from low socio-economic backgrounds
  • expand flexible offerings for students
  • expand opportunities for regional students to attend university
  • adopt a whole-of-institution approach to attract and retain Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students and staff.
Universities Australia recommends that the Australian Government:
  • maintain income-contingent HELP loans
  • maintain a system that enables any Australian who is capable of studying at university to do so
  • expand sub-bachelor places
  • maintain successful equity programs
  • collaborate with universities on employment and graduate skill demand
  • increase the stock of affordable student housing.

Theme 2 Develop Australia’s globally engaged university sector

To develop Australia’s globally engaged university sector, Australian universities will:
  • improve international students’ welfare and university experience
  • improve English language proficiency and opportunities for cultural exchange
  • extend student housing services
  • expand provision offshore
  • continue to globalise their curriculum
  • stimulate study abroad
  • strengthen international research links.
Universities Australia recommends that the Australian Government:
  • further refine its regulation of international education
  • broaden advice on international education to include all the industries that are substantially involved in international education
  • support international research collaboration
  • advance the 2012 APEC leaders’ declaration to enhance student mobility by providing incentives for students to complete at least part of their degree overseas and assistance to universities for outbound mobility programs.

Theme 3 A powerful research and innovation system that drives economic and social progress

To develop a powerful research and innovation system that drives economic and social progress, universities will:
  • review how best to train PhD graduates for employment in the broader economy and increase the number of international students enrolled in PhDs
  • extend and deepen collaboration and connections with the end users of research
  • expand research outreach through strategic engagement and wider access to research outputs.
Universities Australia recommends that the Australian Government:
  • adopt a long-term and sustainable research investment plan
  • increase the maximum duration of the major national competitive grants by two to three years
  • fund the integrated health research centres discussed by the McKeon review of health and medical research in Australia
  • increase support for international research collaboration
  • partner with universities to evaluate the impact of research
  • increase direct investment and incentives for investing in research establish an efficient and integrated research publications data, records and text access system.

Theme 4 Efficiency, investment and regulation

To further improve efficiency, universities will:
  • introduce external peer moderation of standards
  • integrate technologies to support teaching and enhance the student experience
  • increase philanthropic donations
  • further explore and adopt measures to enhance their operational efficiency.
Universities Australia recommends that the Australian Government:
  • appoint the Productivity Commission to review the regulatory burden placed on the university sector, with special attention to removing duplication between jurisdictions, and excluding universities from regulatory regimes where a strong public interest rationale and benefit cannot be identified
  • leave uncapped the number of undergraduate places it funds at Australian universities
  • maintain its current indexation of higher education funding and consider lifting base funding per student by 2.5 per cent each year over a five-year period
  • identify a continuing source of funds for university infrastructure
  • match philanthropic donations
  • negotiate intakes into graduate programs in institutional compacts.
...

Expand flexible offerings

Australian universities are using new information and communication technologies to make higher education more flexible, more accessible and more productive. Many universities are offering programs online, with or without entry requirements, through their own platforms, some by participation in Open Universities Australia or through massive open online courses. As online learning expands it will transform higher education by developing new pedagogies, by making study accessible anywhere at any time, and by introducing new business models. Universities will expand their online and other flexible offerings and will establish more paths for students to move from open and flexible courses to degree courses that can be completed either fully online or in combination with distance and/or campus study. ...

Open access to research

... Australian universities have repositories of their research publications that are open to any person in the world with access to the internet; however, only about 30 per cent of publications are recorded in institutions’ digital repositories and full text is currently available for many fewer publications. The National Health and Medical Research Council and the Australian Research Council now require any publication arising from research to which they contribute funding to be freely accessible to the public within 12 months of publication.

Universities Australia believes that there is enormous public benefit in increasing access to the outcomes of all research, especially research that has been publicly funded. There are a number of logistical, practical and commercial issues that need to be addressed to achieve this goal and Universities Australia, with the support of government, is committed to making Australia’s high-quality research output freely accessible to all. ...

From: "A Smarter Australia: An agenda for Australian higher education 2013-2016", Universities Australia today released , 27 February 2013

Australian Open Access Support Group

The Australian Open Access Support Group (AOASG) has  announced its new web site. AOASG is an open access to research advocacy group set up by six Australian universities (ANU, Charles Sturt, Macquarie, Newcastle, QUT, and Victoria). AOASG point to the Australian research already freely available on-line, including Australian research in Trove, provided by the National Library of Australia ( get a few entries in the system).

The launch of the new AOASG website was not without a few problems. The emailed media release I received actually took me to a Microsoft Outlook login screen at login.live.com. This was after my system warned me it might be a scam. I assume AOASG are using some system to track how successful the announcement was. This can be counterproductive, if it results in the message looking like a scam  or the links not working at all. Also ending up at the Microsoft site is not a good look for an "open access" independent organization, as it makes it look like a front for Microsoft.

I manually entered the web address and that worked okay. Here are the results of the usual checks I run on new websites:
  1. W3C Markup Validation Service: 5 Errors, 2 warning(s) Not unusual and easily corrected.
  2. W3C mobileOK Checker: 68% which is a good score (many websites score zero): 0 critical, 1 severe, 1 medium, 5 low failures.
  3. AChecker: Accessibility Review (Guidelines: WCAG 2.0 (Level AA))" two "Known Problems", much less than the usual number and easily fixed.
The major question the home page doesn't answer is: Who is in the AOASG and what do they provide which I can use? I suggest AOASG need to put the list of organizations which is on the membership page also on the front page, preferably with the logos of these organizations. AOASG also need something on the front page which is of use to the average academic, if not member of the general public, such as a search box where they can find open access content from the AOASG members and a toolkit for implementing open access in their organization.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Australian Government Open Information Access Report

Greetings from Canberra, where Professor John McMillan, the Australian Information Commissioner just launched the report "Open public sector information: from principles to practice".  The commissioner pointed out that agencies have difficulty with the accessibility for the disabled of their documents and do not have metadata for many documents. Another challenge was agencies implementing the government's policy of open access being the default. Professor McMillan was speaking at an event organized by NICTA as part of "Open Data Day".

Open public sector information: from principles to practice

Report on agency implementation of the Principles on open public sector information

February 2013

Contents

  1. Foreword
  2. Background to the PSI survey
    1. Outline of this report
  3. 1. Summary of findings
    1. Overview of key challenges
    2. Priority areas for action
  4. 2. Results
    1. Open PSI Principle 1: Open access to information – a default position
    2. Open PSI Principle 2: Engaging the community
    3. Open PSI Principle 3: Effective information governance
    4. Open PSI Principle 4: Robust information asset management
    5. Open PSI Principle 5: Discoverable and useable information
    6. Open PSI Principle 6: Clear reuse rights
    7. Open PSI Principle 7: Appropriate charging for access
    8. Open PSI Principle 8: Transparent enquiry and complaint process
  5. 3. Analysis
    1. Strong agency leadership
    2. Strategic management of PSI assets
    3. Public engagement
    4. Information management
    5. Using Web 2.0 to support open PSI
    6. Open licensing
    7. Charging for access to PSI
    8. Complaints and enquiries processes
    9. PSI issues for galleries, libraries, archives and museums
    10. Keeping abreast of international developments
  6. Appendix A – PSI survey methodology
    1. Survey implementation
    2. Focus groups
    3. Interim results
  7. Appendix B – Summary of UTS intern research project: Access to and use of public sector information: The academic reuser perspective
    1. Background
    2. Process
    3. Findings and recommendations
  8. Appendix C – Definitions

Thursday, February 21, 2013

Opening Government Data in Australia

NICTA are hosting "Opening Government Data in Australia – Next Steps" with the Australian Information Commissioner, in Canberra at noon on Friday, 22 February 2013. Other Australian events for "Open Data Day" are Hack for Education and Environment at UTS in Sydney and "Maleny2013".

Opening Government Data in Australia 

Description:

To support and encourage the International Open Data Hackthon (http://opendataday.org/), the Australian Information Commissioner, NICTA/eGov Cluster and the Office for Spatial Policy are doing a launch event about next steps for opening up government data in Australia.
Recording: This event will be recorded and published online after the event.
Date: Friday 22 February 2013
Time: 12:00 - 13:00
RSVP : Eventbrite

Schedule:

12:00 – The OAIC will launch their latest publication, Open public sector information; from principles to practice and Australian Information Commissioner Professor John McMillian will discuss:
  • agency successes in implementing the Principles on open public sector information
  • the challenges to be overcome
  • the opportunities for agencies to increase the value of public sector information
  • action the OAIC will take to assist agencies to further implement the Principles
  • international developments in the open government movement
12:20 – Helen Owens from the Office of Spatial Policy – will discuss progress on opening government geospatial data and specifically the Foundation Spatial Data Framework.
12:35 – The eGov Cluster will present some recent projects using government data for public benefits and innovation, and will discuss how governments can collaborate with the private sector.
12:50 – A short Q&A panel session with the speakers about opening government data in Australia.

Friday, January 11, 2013

ARC Rejects Open Access Policy

The Australian Research Council's new "ARC Open Access Policy" requires that "... any publications arising from an ARC supported research project must be deposited into an open access institutional repository within a twelve (12) month period from the date of publication.". Unfortunately the policy still allows researchers to publish in closed journals which never allow public access. The researcher just has to make public where their results can be purchased, they do not have to provide the actual research results for free. The ARC policy is not an open access one and misleading for the ARC to name it as one. The ARC seems to wish to continue the system where the Australian public pays for research and then has to pay again to read the results of the research. In contrast the US NIH Public Access Policy requires scientists to submit final peer-reviewed journal manuscripts that arise from NIH funds to a public archive  upon acceptance for publication, with these papers accessible to the public no later than 12 months after publication.

Dr David Prosser, Director of SPARC Europe criticized the ARC for its lack of an open access policy in a talk at National Library of Australia in Canberra, 14 August 2009.

Sunday, January 06, 2013

UK Open University FutureLearn MOOC Initiative

The UK Open University has been providing free on-line educational materials for decades. I looked at some of OU's courses and tools in 2010. It is a little sad to see that the hype about MOOCs has overshadowed OU's good work, to the point where they need to "launch" open on-line courses. Hopefully OU will not forget all it has learned about delivering quality on-line education with its new FutureLearn initiative and not simply ape the fashion for MOOCs.

Friday, November 23, 2012

Open Access in Europe

Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where Bernard Rentier, Rector, University of Liege, Belgium, is speaking on "Open Access to Scholarly Publications: A European Perspective". He pointed out that open access was opposed by most publishers as it conflicted with their business model, whereas it fitted the university's business model. Within universities the researchers who create publications do not pay for them, the library does.

Professor Rentier suggested the Liege Model could be adopted more widely. The university started creating a repository and a policy requiring authors to deposit their publications with it. He pointed out that it is difficult to get academics to comply with such a policy, but it was possible. One way is to incorporate this in the requirements for research grants: the researcher is required to agree to deposit their publication in the repository or they do not get a grant.

Monday, October 22, 2012

Promoting research through open access

Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where Dr Danny Kingsley, Manager Scholarly Communication & ePublishing, is talking on "Promoting research through open access" as part of Open Access Week. She is pointing out how Australia is a leader is a leader in open access and that Australian academics are benefiting from this.
In my view university libraries need to be more had headed on this and have a fund of money to help promote open access. Otherwise this will cost the universality money, as academic authors will sign away their rights before they know what has happened and the university library will then have to pay to access the material. It would be better in the log term if the libraries invested funds up front to educate their authors about this.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Open Access Week

It is Open Access Week from 22 to 28 October 2012. During the week, university libraries will be hosting talks on making scholarly research more widely available. Some in Australia are:

22 October, Australian National University Promoting research through open access – everything you ever wanted to know
Monday 22nd October – 2.30pm
McDonald Room, Menzies Library
Speaker: Dr Danny Kingsley, Manager Scholarly Communication & ePublishing, with ANU researchers
Summary: This talk aims to provide the background for anyone who wanted to know more about open access but were afraid to ask. The general philosophy of open access is that publicly funded research should be publicly available. The talk will describe the mechanisms for achieving open access, the benefits afforded those who make their work available and the concerns people have about open access. ANU researchers who actively make their work available will discuss their experiences.

23 October Australian National University Copyright and open access in a fast changing landscape
Tuesday 23rd October - 12.30pm
Law Sparke Helmore T2
Speaker: Ellen Broad, Executive Officer, Australian Digital Alliance
Summary: This talk will look at recent issues relating to copyright both overseas and in Australia. Copyright determines what we can and cannot share and recent attempts in the US to enforce copyright online saw an online protest by Wikipedia turning 'off' for 24 hours. In January a proposal for the US Research Works Act - which would make it illegal to have open access a condition of federal research funding - was met with a storm of online protest. Not only was the bill retracted but it spawned an academic boycott of Elsevier in protest of their financial support of the bill. The Australian Law Reform Commission is currently conducting an inquiry into Copyright and the Digital Economy. This is an area to watch. 

24 October
Setting the Default to Open Access: Three Points of ViewBaillieu Library, University of Melbourne This year VALA is celebrating Open Access Week with a panel of three fabulous guest speakers. Each has their own unique perspective on Open Access: the research librarian, the academic and a provider… Organized by VALA - Libraries, Technology and the Future Inc

 The NHMRC mandate and you – a guide
Thursday 25th October – 2.30pm
Manning Clarke Lecture Theatre 4
Speaker: Dr Danny Kingsley, Manager Scholarly Communication & ePublishing, ANU
Summary: The National Health & Medical Research Council has recently commenced its open access policy, and things appear to be moving in this direction at the Australian Research Council. But what is a mandate? And how does it affect researchers? This talk will explore the NHMRC mandate, and look at how mandates are managed by publishers, institutions and funders around the world. 

25 October 
Open Scholarship: Research and Publication
from 10am to 12:30pm – Richard Searby Room - hd2.006.1 Melbourne Burwood Campus Deakin University At Deakin University Australia we are celebrating Open Access Week with a symposium on open scholarship, focusing on open access research and publication. Join with other members of the education com

Thursday, September 06, 2012

Open Access Publishing in Asia and the Pacific

Greetings from the Australian National University in Canberra, where Mr Peter Booth Wiley, Chairman of the Board, John Wiley & Sons, is speaking on "Open-access and scholarly publishing in the 21st century". This is to mark the launch of the new open access publication "Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies" by Wiley and the ANU, during the conference "Positioning policy research in Asia and the Pacific Asia and the Pacific Policy Society's Inaugural Conference".

Mr Wiley provided a definition of open access, as befits a scholarly talk. He challenged Stewart Brand (publisher of the Whole Earth Catalog and merry prankster) assertion that information wants to be free. He emphasized that no research written work is "free", in that someone has to pay for it to be researched. Where this research is undertaken at public expense, there is the impetus for this work to be made available to the public.

Mr Wiley described his role as an author, researcher and publisher, concerned the stewardship of the information needing to be maintained. He is concerned that ill-considered approaches to open access may be harmful to the public. He gave the example of a doctor or engineer reviewing research literature and the danger of that information being incorrect. However, I would differ with Mr Wiley on this point as first of all, it is not clear if publishers make scholarly information more accurate and even volunteer written material, such as Wikipedia has been shown to be more accurate than commercially published material (such as commercial encyclopedias).

Mr Wiley raised the issue of the cost of content for libraries. He also mentioned Open Education Resources (OER), which is the educational equivalent of open access publishing. Also he mentioned Open Access Certification (OAC) of professional skills, a term I was not previously familiar with.

Mr Wiley then criticized PDF as a publishing format, singling out the US Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) for criticism for publishing in this format. He did acknowledge the great efforts made to get documents from paper to the on-line world, but went on to describe the dynamic content now possible.

While I agree PDF is limited, the difficulties of standardized dynamic content are large. Before PDF and HTML, publishers produced e-books in proprietary formats which depended on specific versions of operating systems. These e-book became unreadable within a few years of publication. Current experiments with e-books run the same risk. Also the dynamic content can cost an order of magnitude more to create than a conventional text based book. Mr Wiley described the production of dynamic e-books as being like making a film. This is a good analogy, with film making being much more expensive than typesetting a book. In addition readers still need a conventional linear, static, book-like path through the dynamic work, as a default option.

Mr Wiley said that the "gold road" would change the funding model from the library paying the publisher to the author paying the publisher (with research article publishing cost being covered by research grants). A green road would have the government mandating that government funded research resultants be published open access (I signed a submission to the Australian Research Council, to this effect). A hybrid model would combine elements of the gold and green models. An approach which Mr Wiley did not mention, was advertising supported publishing.

Mr Wiley asked how to manage commercialization in an open access environment. He cautioned that Australia might provide publican openly and China would not reciprocate. This did not seem to me to be a risk, as there would be sufficient befits to Australia for open access, even without reciprocation.

What Mr Wiley did not address in his speech is what commercial publishers offer to on-line scholarly publishing. Academics write the papers and now typeset them themselves. Other academics review the papers and then approve their publication using free open source software. University librarians handle the dissemination of the papers. It is not clear what commercial publishers offer in this process.
Public Lecture

Title: Open-access and scholarly publishing in the 21st century

Speakers: Mr Peter Booth Wiley, Chairman of the Board, John Wiley & Sons

Date: 6/9/12

Time: 12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

Description: Peter Booth Wiley is the Chairman of the Board of John Wiley & Sons, a global publishing house founded in 1807. A member of Wiley’s Board of Directors for 28 years and Chairman for 10, he represents the sixth generation of his family to participate in the leadership of the company. During his time as Chairman, Wiley & Sons has moved content online, in interactive and user-friendly applications.

A former journalist and newspaper columnist, Wiley is the author of five books including a history of libraries and the San Francisco Public Library and was the senior editor and lead writer of Knowledge for Generations: John Wiley & Sons and the Global Publishing Industry, 1807-2007.

Wiley is a member of the Board of Directors of the University of California Press, the Friends of the San Francisco Public Library, and of the Library Advisory Council of California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Wiley writes and speaks frequently about the history of publishing, the writing experience, and the transformation of publishing as a global undertaking in a digital environment.

Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy, will be published online three times a year by Wiley Blackwell, with all contribution made freely available from Wiley Online Library.

This lecture is presented by the Asia and the Pacific Policy Society at the Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU.


Monday, September 03, 2012

Open-access and scholarly publishing in the 21st century

Mr Peter Booth Wiley, Chairman of the Board, John Wiley & Sons, will speak on "Open-access and scholarly publishing in the 21st century" at the Australian National University in Canberra, 12:30 pm, 6 September 2012.
Public Lecture

Title: Open-access and scholarly publishing in the 21st century

Speakers: Mr Peter Booth Wiley, Chairman of the Board, John Wiley & Sons

Date: 6/9/12

Time: 12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

Description: Peter Booth Wiley is the Chairman of the Board of John Wiley & Sons, a global publishing house founded in 1807. A member of Wiley’s Board of Directors for 28 years and Chairman for 10, he represents the sixth generation of his family to participate in the leadership of the company. During his time as Chairman, Wiley & Sons has moved content online, in interactive and user-friendly applications.

A former journalist and newspaper columnist, Wiley is the author of five books including a history of libraries and the San Francisco Public Library and was the senior editor and lead writer of Knowledge for Generations: John Wiley & Sons and the Global Publishing Industry, 1807-2007.

Wiley is a member of the Board of Directors of the University of California Press, the Friends of the San Francisco Public Library, and of the Library Advisory Council of California State Polytechnic University, San Luis Obispo. Wiley writes and speaks frequently about the history of publishing, the writing experience, and the transformation of publishing as a global undertaking in a digital environment.

Asia and the Pacific Policy Studies, the flagship journal of the Crawford School of Public Policy, will be published online three times a year by Wiley Blackwell, with all contribution made freely available from Wiley Online Library.

This lecture is presented by the Asia and the Pacific Policy Society at the Crawford School of Public Policy, ANU.


Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Case study for open data and public engagement

Pia Waugh will speak on "GovHack: a case study for open data and public engagement" at the NICTA in Canberra, 14 June 2012. Pia did a brilliant job organizing the GovHack, event in Canberra and Sydney recently. The winning applications, created during the event make use of open government data in interesting, useful and sophisticated ways:

GovHack: a case study for open data and public engagement

Pia Waugh

NICTA SML SEMINAR

DATE: 2012-06-14
TIME: 11:15:00 - 12:00:00
LOCATION: NICTA - 7 London Circuit
CONTACT: avraham.ruderman@nicta.com.au

ABSTRACT:
Pia Waugh was an organiser for GovHack, a recent 48 hour developer event where over 40 projects were created from scratch around the themes of science, digital humanities and open government. Pia will talk about the event, how it worked, the outcomes and what it demonstrates about the value of public data being publicly available, the opportunities for science communications, and the innovation that results from collaboration across government, science, technology and civil society.

Tuesday, June 05, 2012

GovJam Opening in Canberra

Greetings from the Inspire Centre at the University in Canberra where Senator Lundy opened GovJam, a global event looking at new ways to do government online. This followed GovCamp today and GovHack on the weekend. The "Jam" is the most informal of the events, with some group activities to free up the participant's thinking. There is a secret "theme" for the event (which you will have to find out by joining in online). The Global Headquarters is here in Canberra, but there are also local events in: Brisbane, Katherine, Paris, Köln (Cologne), Thessaloniki, Tehran, Milan, Bilbao, Madrid and London.

Monday, June 04, 2012

GovHack 2012 Winners

Winning applications of the use of government data, announced at GovHack last night were:
  • Digital Humanities Category:
  • Science Category:
    • Time Capsule: visualise trends in 44 metrics over the last 30 years, sourced from 15 government data sets.
  • Open Government Category:
    • Best Benefit to the ACT Community Award :
    • History in ACTION: Create your own personalised bus tour of Canberra history
    • Best Open Government Award: OpenBudget: government expenditure visualisation tool.

Minor Prize Categories – NSW

  • Best Use of Location Data:
    • Route Me: for getting to where you’re going on the ACT bus system. Integrates Twitter.
  • Best Data Analysis:
  • Best Contribution to Open Data:
    • OpenBudget: government expenditure visualisation tool.
  • Special prize for Sydney:
  • Best Data Visualisation :
    • Time Capsule visualise trends in 44 metrics over the last 30 years, sourced from 15 government data sets.
  • Best Spirit of GovHack Award:

Minor Prize Categories – ACT

Best Use of Location Data (Geospatial) – supported by the Office for Spatial Policy

    • OkCapital: Dating site for finding your ideal city to live in
  • Best Data Analysis:
    • 3D Data on a Mesh : summarise 55,845 data observations from the Bureau of Meteorology in a single picture.
  • Best Contribution to Open Data:
  • Best Augmented Reality Hack – supported by Adobe
  • Best Data Visualisation – awarded by Adobe
  • Best Spirit of GovHack Award:
    • 100 Years iPad application which provides a data visualisation of the past 100 years of rainfall and temperature

Redesigning World Government Online

Following on from GovHack in Canberra/Sydney and Govcamp in Canberra, the global GovJam, commences 5:45pm 5 June 2012 (Canberra time). The event will be launched Senator the Hon Kate Lundy, Minister for Sport, Minister for
Multicultural Affairs, Minister Assisting for Industry and Innovation (See video of Senator Lundy at the first GovHack in 2009).

You can take part in the GovJam from anywhere in the world online via the Global Headquarters (Canberra). There are also local events in: Brisbane, Canberra, Katherine, Paris, Köln (Cologne), Thessaloniki, Tehran, Milan, Bilbao, Madrid and London.

Here is the program for Canberra:
Wednesday:
8:30 am – 5:30 pm – Jamming
11:30 am – Transit of Venus
5:00 pm – link in with French Government and project transfers overseas
6:00pm – Dinner at Zieholtz UC (optional, at own cost)
7:30pm – Special Screening of I AM on Hyperwall at INSPIRE

Thursday:
8:30 – 5:30pm – Jamming, presentations, awards
Alcohol Tuesday evening is on a BYO basis.
So, what do you need to do to make this Jam phenomenal?
1. Check out the rules of the Jam - http://www.govjam.org/content/jam-rules
2. Check out your Jamming Wednesday:
8:30 am – 5:30 pm – Jamming
11:30 am – Transit of Venus
5:00 pm – link in with French Government and project transfers overseas
6:00pm – Dinner at Zieholtz UC (optional, at own cost)
7:30pm – Special Screening of I AM on Hyperwall at INSPIRE

Thursday:
8:30 – 5:30pm – Jamming, presentations, awards
Alcohol Tuesday evening is on a BYO basis.
So, what do you need to do to make this Jam phenomenal?

Sunday, June 03, 2012

Reinventing the Australian Government in Sydney

Greetings from GovHack at Macquarie University in Sydney There are about 50 people here for the final session of the weekend event. Currently we are watching presentations from the Canberra node, where there are about another 100 people. They are showing applications using interesting combinations of government data in news ways: turning weather data into 2D jewelery, combining bus stop data with geographic databases to plot the easiest walking route to the bus stop. One of the most sophisticated proposals was Peter Chen's "WatChr" political analysis tool. Another application of notes was "Walk My Way", to encourage people to walk part of their journey before catching the bus.

A summary of the GovHack projects will be presented to GovCamp at University of Canberra on Tuesday:

ps: One of the more unusual uses of government data was an analysis of a proposal for a solar powered very fast train from Sydney to Canberra. This seemed fanciful, but developments in lithium iron batteries, developed for cars have made the batterers large enough to be considered for trains. Obviously the solar panels would not be located on the train but alongside.

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

MIT Free Open Learning Software

MIT has announced that it is making its MITx open learning software available free in "spring 2012". But if MIT wants to offer educational facilities on-line worldwide, it will need to adjust to a wider range of cultures. As an example "spring" is at a different time of year in the southern hemisphere.Link