The
Environment
and Communications Committee of the Australian Senate
is holding an
Inquiry into the Government's Direct Action Plan on Climate Change. I have been revising the notes for my
on-line graduate course on ICT Sustainability, which starts in mid February at the Australian National University. The notes are published as "
ICT Sustainability: Assessment and Strategies for a Low Carbon Future". In these I mentioned the ALP government's plan for a fixed carbon price, to be followed by carbon trading. The new coalition government had proposed a "Direct Action Plan", but what exactly is it and how much did I need to change my course to cover this? It turned out that at a technical level there was not that much difference between the old and new approaches.
The new government's approach could be characterised as a "Carbon Tax" as the cost of abatement measures by industry will be subsidised by government.
In December 2013 the
new Australian Government released a Green Paper on a new "Emissions
Reduction Fund" (ERF).
This envisaged replacing the previous government's carbon trading scheme
with a reverse
auction. The
reverse auction itself will be technically
simpler to implement than the
trading mechanism proposed by the previous government, as
it will involve far fewer transactions. However,
the same environmental auditing
standards will
be used to verify the amount of
emissions traded.
Also extensive measures will need to be put in place to protect the auction system
from manipulation.
The
then Australian Department of
Climate Change and Energy released a National
Carbon Offset Standard in
2010. This set minimum
standards for calculating and auditing the carbon footprint of an
organisation. The standard covers calculating the greenhouse gas
emissions associated with an organisation's activities, product or
service. It also includes the general principles of acquisition and
retirement of carbon
offsets. These
were to be used for the former government's Clean
Energy Future 2011)
fixed carbon
price and trading
scheme and is envisaged being
used for the new scheme.
While
the new
ERF
will have a relatively small number of transactions compared
to the previously proposed treading scheme,
each will be of a high value. This will require measures to combat
likely attempts
to defraud the system. The European Union Emissions Trading System
(EU ETS), has been subject to hacking to steal emissions allowances
and fraud. The cost of measures to deter, detect and investigate
fraud in the Australian system is likely to be a significant part
of the cost of the overall system.
No comments:
Post a Comment