Showing posts with label Government ICT. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Government ICT. Show all posts

Sunday, June 05, 2016

Digital Government: Transforming Public Services, Regulation, and Citizenship

Last month I attended a talk by Mr Angus Taylor MP, Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister for Cities and Digital Transformation on digital transformation at Australian Parliament House, Canberra. Mr Taylor mentioned his monograph "The Promise of Digital Government: Transforming Public Services, Regulation, and Citizenship" (Menzies Research Centre, 1 April 2016). This is modest in size, at 78 pages, but ambitious in aim: to transform not only the way services are delivered, but also how we think about Government. This is from the point of view of a conservative politician, emphasizing contest-ability for the delivery of government services, with maximum private sector involvement. However, while Mr Taylor's political opponents might use different rhetoric to describe their aims, I suspect they would agree with many of the aims and methods.
 
The difficulty with digital government comes at the level of implementation: are governments, whichever their political views, willing to invest in personnel with the skills needed to implement digital government? Are they willing to accept the political cost of implementation, such as where the use of on-line service delivery results in the closure of shop-front services in marginal electorates?
 
To give one example, schools currently run on a pre-digital model. Recent initiatives, such as a reduction in class size, have increased the cost of education, without any discernible improvement in outcomes (and may have actually reduced the quality of education) An alternative would be to "flip" the education system, particularly at the upper end. Students would be provided with on-line resources and highly qualified on-line teachers, to supplement their face-to-face education. Also the student's parents would be provided with information on the children's learning. However, one implication of this would be more students per teacher (as each teacher would cost much more due to their higher qualifications). There would also be a requirement for parents to take an active part in their children's education (with parents being given tasks to compete and tracked as to performance). The political reality that parents just want school as a form of government funded child minding might then become apparent.

Wednesday, May 04, 2016

Promise of Digital Government

Greetings from the Australian Parliament House in Canberra, where I have been taking part in a forum on digital transformation. The speaker was Mr Angus Taylor MP, Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister for Cities and Digital Transformation. Mr Taylor is author of The Promise of Digital Government: Transforming Public Services, Regulation, and Citizenship (Menzies Research Centre, 1 April 2016). It was impressive to hear from a minister who is so across his portfolio that he had written on the subject. One correction to what the Minister said: the essay is available on Amazon (both in paper and Kindle formats). The forum was hosted by Inside Canberra.

Tuesday, August 06, 2013

ACS Fails to Secure the Digital Economy

The Australian Computer Society (ACS) has identified five key ICT issues to raise during the federal election campaign: Skills, Digital Literacy, Advice to Government, Data on the Digital Economy and Open Data. While these are important issues, computer security is missing from the list. In my view the security of the national information infrastructure needs to be urgently addressed, as Australia is vulnerable to on-line attack by criminals, terrorists and nation states.

One way to secure the infrastructure would be for the Australian Defence Force (ADF) to raise an Australian CyberWarfare Battalion (ACWB) of 300 personnel, to protect Australia's national information infrastructure. All but a small cadre would be reserve military personnel who have full time jobs as computer security professionals.

Friday, April 05, 2013

GovCamp and GovHack 2013 Open for Ideas

For the last few months I have been helping organize GovCamp and GovHack 2013 and we are now up to the stage of inviting expressions of interest from those interested in taking part. This is an annual event  part conference, part un-conference and part hacking competition, on how to make government better with technology. At GovCamp/GovHack 2012 150 developers in Canberra and Sydney worked on 40 projects. This year prizes for the best hacks will be announced at GovCamp 2013, 6 June. As well as Canberra, there will be satellite events in Adelaide, Sydney, Tasmania, Perth, Melbourne, Brisbane and the Gold Coast, see the website for details or to register your own site.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

ICT Empowering Citizen Engagement

Greetings from the CSIRO Discovery centre in Canberra where Mike Mitchelmore, Acting GM Strategy and Architecture, Department of Human Services (DHS) is speaking on the "Role of strategy and architecture in empowering citizen engagement". This is a meeting of the Australian Computer Society Special Interest Group of Strategy and Architecture. There is DHS Technology Plan 2012-2016 with a strategy of providing as many services for the citizens on-line as possible, preferably via mobile devices. Unfortunately, while there is an outline of the plan in the DHS Annual Report, I was not able to find the plan itself (Australian Government policy requires DHS to publish the report on-line). However, technology features in the "DHS Strategic Plan 2012–16".

DHS was formed from several government agencies which made payments to citizens. So DHS has considerable work to do, consolidating systems. There is also considerable scope for making service delivery better and cheaper, with citizens not having to deal with so many separate government offices.

DHS also has some systems which have 20 year old software running on  Model 204 Database.  DHS is planning to use SAP and Microsoft software. This would appear to me to be a very high risk strategy. The aim of rationalizing and centralizing may not be a good diea in an era of constant change. It is unlikely DHS could rationalize its systems before the next restructuring of government agencies (likely after this year's election) which would require the systems to be split again.

It may be better for DHS to build a set of systems which can work together, but be split apart when required. An alternative approach would be for DHS to build systems which can be used by any government agency, so other agencies could keep using the same systems when functions are administratively transferred.

DHS is building some interesting Apps, which will particularly appeal to university students. But it would be prudent for DHS to also offer an equivalent web application.

Some of DHS plans will provide benefits both for the government and citizens. An example is "tell us once" where citizens can advise just once of changes of address or bank account number for payments.
ACS Strategy and Architecture SIG:
The role of strategy and architecture in empowering citizen engagement ...
The role of strategy and architecture in empowering citizen engagement with government through effective ICT-based systems and services.
The Department of Human Services (http://www.humanservices.gov.au/) is responsible for the development of service delivery policy and provides access to social, health and other payments and services. It is currently undergoing major changes as part of Service Delivery Reform, which is designed to give Australians better access to social, health and welfare services. The aim is to improve services to meet people’s needs by providing more tailored and intensive support where it is needed most.
Modern and effective use of ICT is crucial to many of the initiatives that the Department is undertaking. Contemporary ICT offers new ways of delivering more attractive and engaging citizen service delivery models. Strategy and architecture plays a pivotal role in providing clear and achievable roadmaps for ICT-supported service delivery.
In this presentation, Mike will talk about the journey DHS is undertaking to move from legacy ICT supporting a traditional service delivery model to one that enables engaging, citizen-centric service delivery.
Biography: Mike Mitchelmore Acting GM Strategy and Architecture Department of Human Services Mike Mitchelmore joined the Department of Human Services (the department) as the National Manager of the Strategic Vendor Management and Sourcing Branch, in February 2012. Mike is currently the Acting General Manager of the Strategy, Architecture and Shared Services Division, within the Chief Information Officer Group. In this role, Mike leads ICT Strategy and Innovation, Architecture Standards, Enterprise Architecture, Enterprise Testing and the ICT Software Review Project, on behalf of the department. Previously, Mike was the Chief Information Officer for the Australian Research Council and has held several senior positions at the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. Mike is a former Army officer and graduate of the Australian Officer Cadet School (Portsea), the Army Command and Staff College (Queenscliff) and the Royal Military College of Science (UK). He holds a Bachelor of Social Science, a Graduate Diploma of Telecommunications Systems Management and a Graduate Diploma of Management Studies. He is a graduate of Army Staff College (psc), and Army Technical Staff College UK (JTC). Mike was awarded the City of London Institute Guild Award for his research into Military Technology.

Wednesday, December 26, 2012

Australian Government Cloud Service Provider Certification

Glenn Archer, Acting Australian Government Chief Information Officer, has released a "Draft Report on Cloud Service Provider Certification Requirements for the Australian Government" for comment. The report recommends expanding the Data Centre as a Service (DCaaS) Multi Use List (MUL) to include cloud services and "cloud like" services. In the longer term the draft Australian Government Commercial Service Provider Assurance Framework would be extended to encompass cloud services.  Also the report recommends looking at the "National Standing Committee on Cloud Computing" (NSCCC) an industry body and the New Zealand Cloud Computing Code of Practice and the CSA Security, Trust and Assurance Registry (STAR) Program.

Thursday, December 13, 2012

Audit of Learning Technologies in Government Schools

Photo of report coverThe Victorian Government conducted an audit of Learning Technologies in Government Schools. It was found that the Victorian government's policy for ICT in schools, titled the Digital Learning Statement, lacks a clear action plan and framework for investment in learning technology. As a result there is "... little guidance on how future learning technology initiatives can be appropriately planned and integrated". More positively the planning for a fibre-optic network for schools was found to have a "robust needs and options analysis". However, the software project, called "Ultranet", was "...poorly planned and implemented". The system is 80 per cent over budget, late, has a low uptake rate and limited functionality. It would seem to me that the Victorian Government should retain the network and computer hardware, but replace the software with open source, including Moodle and Mahara.

The audit report is the equivalent of 53 pages of very clear analysis of a complex social and technical issue. The report would be of value for those interested in the issues of technology for education at all levels, not just schools. The Auditor-General has published the report as a well formatted and efficient HTML web page as well as the more usual (and harder to read) PDF.

Conclusion

DEECD’s Digital Learning Statement (the Statement) does not provide a clear action plan or framework for investment in learning technologies. There is no supporting strategy or further detail to the Statement. This means that departmental staff and school leaders have little guidance on how future learning technology initiatives can be appropriately planned and integrated to build upon past and present ICT investments.
Planning for the VicSmart high-speed fibre-optic network for all government schools was underpinned by a robust needs and options analysis. Although the project was a less complex infrastructure rollout, it was well executed and is delivering its desired benefits. The high-speed connectivity that VicSmart provides is a key enabler of current and future digital learning in government schools.
In contrast, the Ultranet, the Statement’s key foundation plank and key enabler, was poorly planned and implemented. Six years after its announcement as a government priority, it is yet to achieve expected benefits for students, parents and schools. It is significantly late, more than 80 per cent over its first announced budget, has very low uptake by users, and does not have the functionality originally intended.
This audit identified a number of serious probity, procurement and financial management issues surrounding the Ultranet project. DEECD’s tender process lacked rigour and was seriously flawed. There is little confidence in the costing and financial management practices around the Ultranet project, and limited assurance that the selected outcome represented value for money.

Findings

Digital Learning Statement
The Digital Learning Statement—the government’s current policy document on the use of learning technologies—was not informed by robust and comprehensive research and does not make a clear and cogent case for government investment in learning technologies.
The Statement does not deliver on the directive in the 2008 Blueprint for Education and Early Childhood Development to provide a plan of action to use learning technologies in teaching and learning. A review of DEECD’s advice to the Minister for Education shows that the government was not advised that the Statement did not comply with the Blueprint’s directive to develop and deliver a strategy.
To date, there has been no accompanying detailed strategy developed to support the Statement, even though this was originally planned.
VicSmart high-speed broadband for schools
Planning for VicSmart was underpinned by a robust needs and options analysis, as demonstrated by its 2005 business case, which articulated the needs to be addressed and provided a clear rationale for the purchase of high-speed fibre-optic broadband connectivity. The business case provided confidence that the project was achievable and could be delivered as planned.
The VicSmart procurement process was streamlined by using a mandated whole-of-government single-source provider. The fibre-optic system is performing as expected and has been upgraded incrementally to meet emerging data and connectivity needs across the government school system.
Ultranet e-learning system
The Ultranet project was poorly planned and implemented. None of its three business cases had a well thought out needs analysis or gave considered options to deliver the project. The various business cases did not answer the ‘Why invest?’ question for the Ultranet, nor did they provide a sound basis for the project’s approval.
Some six years since its announcement as a government priority, the Ultranet has not delivered its main objectives:
  • to improve responsiveness to individual learning needs
  • to provide better information to parents, the school system and government
  • to improve the efficiency of the learning environment and school administration.
Consistent with public sector practice, the Department of Treasury and Finance (DTF) and the Department of Premier and Cabinet (DPC) provided advice to government at key decision points over the life of the Ultranet project.
The project continued despite advice from central agencies that it should cease or be delayed. Further, there is no trail of documentary evidence to explain whether or how DEECD addressed the many critical issues raised by DPC and DTF.
It is difficult to understand why the Ultranet procurement was able to proceed to contract execution, given the significant concerns raised by DPC and DTF, as well as the many adverse ratings that DEECD had received from various Gateway reviews since the project first commenced.
Further, this audit detected a number of serious process and probity issues in relation to tendering and procurement for the Ultranet. DEECD has advised that it has commenced a number of actions and further detailed investigations in response to these matters.
There is little confidence that the financial management practices relating to the Ultranet were sound and that full costs have been adequately recorded. VAGO estimates that actual capital and operating expenditure for the Ultranet was approximately $162 million as at June 2012, and by June 2013 it is likely to have cost approximately $180 million. DEECD has advised that it is currently investigating the financial practices in relation to this major ICT project.
Despite this significant expenditure, no cost-benefit analysis has been conducted to determine whether the Ultranet provides value for money, or whether the same functionality could have been delivered more cost effectively.
Performance indicators for the Ultranet have been revised down over time and do not provide appropriate measures of whether the Ultranet is achieving what the government expected when it funded the project.
Use of the Ultranet is low, and declining. On average, only 10 per cent of students and 27 per cent of teachers logged in on a monthly basis from July 2011 to May 2012.
An underlying factor which has limited the effective implementation of the Ultranet is the significant discrepancy between the original scope of the project and expected benefits and what has actually been implemented and delivered. This underscores the urgent need for DEECD to review whether it should continue to invest in this project.
Further, DEECD did not adequately manage the change processes required to maximise the Ultranet’s acceptance and, therefore, the state’s return on investment. Teachers and parents were not appropriately trained and supported to use the Ultranet. Ultimately, the Ultranet is only a technology tool, and cannot by itself deliver the benefits intended from it.

Recommendations

The Department of Education and Early Childhood Development should:
  1. develop a comprehensive and evidence‑based strategy or plan of action for use of learning technologies to underpin and guide the significant investment in ICT for government schools
  2. develop performance indicators that measure both VicSmart’s ongoing operational performance and its achievement of intended benefits
  3. urgently review its investment in the Ultranet, with a particular focus on:
    • assessing whether the contractor has delivered all functionality as required by the contract and what action, if any, needs to be taken to enforce the state’s rights
    • rigorously assessing its financial management practices and identifying the real, current cost of the Ultranet to determine the extent to which further investment is warranted
    • identifying and addressing the underlying causes of low take‑up rates across the school system by teachers, students and parents
    • providing advice to government on the cost-benefit of decommissioning the system now against continuing to fund and rectify the system so that it can be implemented as originally expected
  4. conduct an agency-wide review of its internal tendering, probity and financial management practices in light of the serious issues identified by this audit
  5. expedite the provision of guidance to schools on the current status of the Ultranet as the department’s key learning technology investment, and clarify the policy context of schools’ autonomy in purchasing non-Ultranet learning technologies. ...
From: Learning Technologies in Government Schools, Victorian Auditor-General, 12 December 2012

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Australia to Join European Emissions Trading System

The Australian Government and European Commission have agreed to link the Australian and European carbon emissions trading systems, by 1 July 2018. Australian and European businesses will be able to buy and sell carbon units on the Australian emissions trading scheme and the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS).

The linking will require the minimum price set for carbon in Australia to be removed to make it compatible with Europe. The lower price of carbon in the European system may cause some adjustment problems for Australia.

The linking also has implications for how, and if, Australia runs its own on-line system for carbon trading. The Australian Government was tendering for a carbon trading system. But it may be simpler to use the European system directly. There have been problems with the security of the European system, but these should be resolved by 2018.

Friday, December 09, 2011

Australian Cloud Computing Report

The Australian Department of Innovation has released the report "Cloud Computing: Opportunities and Challenges" from the IT Industry Innovation Council (11 October 2011). The report suggests there is a "... window of opportunity for Australia to be a global leader in the creation and adoption of Cloud computing innovation, both in the sense of being a leading ICT cloud computing solutions provider and in the more general sense of being a leading Cloud computing adopter...". The report recommends Australian governments and industry "... react promptly ..." to use cloud computing for productivity and high‐value ICT jobs creation. However, the report does not detail how to do this. One useful area of the report are proposals for data protection (I run a course at the ANU on "COMP7420: Electronic Document and Records Management").
Executive Summary

Cloud computing has emerged as the decade’s biggest shift in the way organisations use Information Technology (IT). The following outlines a summary of advice to the Hon Kim Carr Minister for Innovation, Industry, Science and Research from the Information Technology Industry Innovation Council regarding the industry development opportunites and challenges presented by the growth of Cloud computing.

The ‘Cloud’ provides a new paradigm for delivering computing resources (for example, infrastructure, platform, software, etc.) to customers on demand, in a similar fashion as that provided by utilities (such as water, electricity, gas, etc.). Authoritative international market research from a number of different sources predicts that the global market for Cloud prodcts and services will grow rapidly in the next few years. The global research firm IDC predicts a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 27.4 percent in public cloud services (including software as a service) up to 2014, rising to a total global market value of over US$55 billion1. The US‐based research firm 451 Group predicts that core cloud platform and infrastructure services outside of software‐as‐a‐service will grow at a CAGR of higher than 60 percent in the same period2. All major IT research and advisory firms predict that Cloud related products and services will grow much faster than traditionl IT services – typically at around four to five times a greater rate. This rapid growth dynamic provides a great opportunity for innovative Australian IT firms with leading‐edge Cloud technologies to achieve increased revenues and also for related improvements in local IT employment.

It is worth noting that with the local Australian ICT (Information & Communication Technologies) marketplace having a reported value of over $75 billion, and with the same fundamental dynamics regarding Cloud growth applying here to those playing out globally, there is also significant market revenue potential opening up specifically within Australia for Cloud providers. The following chart from IDC reflects that a projected 7.1 percent of total ICT spending in Australia in 2015 will be directl Cloud related, up from 2.8 percent in 2011. This will be a net increase in value of around $4.3 billion. However with many Cloud services being able to be provided from any geographic location, it is important from a local industry development perspective to focus on maximising the related opportunities arising for locl Australian ICT providers.

1http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/networking/cloud‐computing‐to‐grow‐at‐5‐times‐rate‐of‐traditional‐it‐says‐idc/3133
2 http://www.prweb.com/releases/cloud/computing/prweb4771704.htm

The key to maximising these relative opportunities lies in fuelling the level of demand for Cloud computing services and minimiing current barriers to take‐up. There needs to be a strong pull from the non‐ICT sector in terms of understanding the fundamental business benefits of Cloud adoption, including operational efficiencies, greater reach into markets, cost reduction, reduced risk of IT investment with pay‐as‐you‐go pricing, and greater flexibility to handle changes in business conditions.

A September 2011 IDC survey of enterprises in Australia found that 20.6 per cent of the respondents are already using Cloud comuting, while 38.2 per cent are actively testing or planning to deploy Cloud services in the next six to 12 months. A further 41.2 per cent of companies are planning to implement Cloud services by 2013. These are positive indications that demand is growing rapidly.


We can conclude from the various expert insights that the local Australian Cloud market growth opportunities are real and provie a clearly addressable potential for local ICT providers. The extent of the Cloud market potential touches all of the segments of the broad ICT industry – including Software, Services, Hardware, Communications and Research.

Furthermore, we believe that there is an additional local industry development growth potential inherent in the proposition that Australia ould be considered as a regional hub for the hosted provision and development of cloud computing services. This issue was canvassed by the recent Lateral Economics report, “The potential for cloud computing services in Australia.” The report was prepared on behalf of Macquarie Telecom, who are represented on the ITIIC, and also sit on the working group behind this report.

The Lateral Economics report notes that Australia’s geographic isolation provides a natural protection for Australian suppliersof cloud services to the domestic market and they argue that the Australian ICT sector should capitalise on this situation and uild a strong domestic footprint, while along the way, positioning itself as a preferred supplier to nearby markets.

Importantly the report also highlights Australia’s low sovereign risk and stable political environment as providing an attractie basis for foreign investment. Furthermore it emphasises the benefits to consumers of existing laws such as the Privacy Act and the National Privacy Principls – benefits that would be further enhanced if the Exposure Draft on Australia’s Privacy Principles issued in June 2011 is enacted

A further significant competitive advantage that Australia has over many other geographic locations in the Asia/Pacific region for the provision of hosted Cloud services relates to the wide potential availability of low‐carbon energy resources to support a desirable “Green IT footprint” for data centres. With growing global awareness of Corporate Social Responsibility needs in the economic requirements of fast‐growth companies this is important to note.

The ITIIC believe that taking positive steps to create new levels of consumer and business confidence in use of Cloud Computingsolutions will have the additional benefit of helping position Australia as a national and regional Cloud leader – increasing the related industry development in software solutions and hosting centres, thereby boosting jobs and productivity whilst attracting global investment. Australia has strong fundamentals that are needed to make this a global reality; the leading‐edge ICT skills, the legal, political and geographical certainties, as well as the assurance that data hosted here is secure. Powered and supported by transformative national initiatives such as the NBN, Australia increasingly has the infrastructure capacity and expert capability to plug into the world and reap the associated adantages.

Our overall assessment for the broad sector is that the Cloud computing market shift will impact parts of the existing Australin ICT industry in different ways,

Those elements of the ICT industry which focus on developing software solutions and software services will most likely need to apidly transition their go‐to‐market models to take advantage of Cloud‐based infrastructure and start providing their software solutions as a service from the Cloud. This may open up new markets for them and provide a springboard for growth, but given the increasing global competition dynamics in a Cloud world it is likely that the most innovative and nimble companis will prosper.

As covered by the Lateral Economics report, the provision of hosted Cloud solutions has significant potential both within Australia and in nearby markets.

While industry analysts are forecasting continued growth in ‘core IT on‐premise services and related computing infrastructure’, those segments of the local ICT industry that currently focus on this area could find growth potentially more challenging overtime. This segment will probably either have to enhance their offerings to become part of a cloud provider marketplace or face the pssibility of gradually being forced to exit this market. Those that do stay in the market will over time have to compete more directly with the global cloud computing market providers where to survive they will need to lower costs and find new local or operational efficiencies and increased productivity. In light of this, ITIIC believe there is a role for both industry associations and government in providing education and awareness for existing ustralian ICT service provider organisations of the benefits and opportunities of Cloud, particularly in the areas of productivity and efficiency improvements, and how to make the transition to providing cloud based solutions.

We further note however, as with any new paradigm shift in market usage conditions, and thereby also change in related industry innovation, that there will be significant new opportunities for Australian ICT industry providers to develop leading solutions and servics for Cloud usage globally. These opportunities will be best prosecuted if industry development of the ICT sector is seen as a key priority by the Australan Government.

The IT Industry Innovation Council recognises that Cloud computing in Australia has incredible growth potential, but is still in its infancy and the maturing of the market has a long way to go. As such it believes that a light touch in relation to government regulation of the market is the most appropriate approach. Outside of market regulation however, we believe that Government has a very key role to play in supporting the sector through some of its policy and procurement actons, and these dimensions are discussed directly in our Recommendations.

In terms of aligning the work of this paper with other key Government activities, the Council is aware that work is being done by the government on security and privacy issues, and on standards, and that there has been a significant body of work undertaken in the past 2 years looking at Cloud computing from a variety ofaspects, not the least of which is the work of the GAP Taskforce on Cloud Computing whose report was released on 25 May 2011. The recommendations of that report represent a balanced approach to the issues, and we would encourage Senator Carr’s consideration of these recommendations (included in Attachment A of this report).

Key recommendations

Recommendations Introduction

The IT IIC Working Group on Cloud Computing has met a number of times to review the nature of advice to the Minister regarding is questions raised. There are some overarching points to be made which “set the scene” for that advice, and these are:

  • That the Council believes there is a current window of opportunity for Australia to be a global leader in the creation and adopion of Cloud computing innovation, both in the sense of being a leading ICT cloud computing solutions provider and in the more general sense of being a leading Coud computing adopter. However Australian governments, Industry and the local ICT sector in particular must react promptly to this possibility with supportive actions (including the prioritising of the following recommendations) to support the achievement of wealth and prosperity arising from that opportunity;
  • That Australian industry and government should focus their energies on the potential for the use of Cloud computing techniques o drive much‐needed improvements in overall national productivity ‐ noting that actions supporting this goal need to be accelerated faster than our international competitors;
  • That there is a significant developing opportunity for local high‐value ICT jobs creation by the development and use of smart Cloud computing applications to improve our global competitiveness nd expand our export potential. The Australian Government should seek wherever practically possible to provide the right kind of stimulus actions in its approch to Cloud computing to encourage the development of a vibrant local ecosystem;
  • The Council notes that there is a need to engender a sense of urgency and clear political leadership in this debate. Governments in other jurisdictions around the world are beginning to consider and take specific actions to encourage and promte their country as a leader in Cloud computing. One example of this in the procurement context is United States Government’s “Cloud First” policy which requires federal government agencies to first consider cloud as a mechanism to deliver any new IT initiatives. Another example from a consumer protection perspective is the discussion paper recently released by the Singapore Government’ Ministry of Information, Communications and the Arts for a Proposed Consumer Data Protection Regime for Singapore. The paper expressly notes: “A general DP [data protection] law will also strengthen Singapore’s position as a trusted hub and create a conducive environment for the fast‐growing global data management and data processing industries, such as cloud computing, to thrive in Singapore. Singapore has many competitive advantages as a data hosting location, such as its telecommunications infrastructure, geographical location, safety from natural disasters and power reliability. However the lack of a general DP law in Singapore may increasingly be seen as a significant disadvantage that could deter somecompanies from choosing to host their data here. The development of DP legislation would thus support Singapore’s future development as a global hub for data.”
Recommendations Summary

The ITIIC Working Group on Cloud Computing makes the following recommendations to Minister Carr:

1. The ITIIC recognises the valued work of the recent GAP Cloud Computing taskforce (coordinated by Department of Broadband, Communications & Digital Economy), and commends the GAP recommendations to the Minister.

The report’s recommendations focus on maximising the benefits of Cloud computing and minimising its risk. It calls for government to issue a statement of support for Cloud computing. Other recommendations advocate government adopting a position of leadership and vision, the establishment of a standing public/private Cloud Committee, domestic and international engagement, assessing Australia’s Cloud readiness, education and awareness, and co‐regulation, including the possible development by industry of cloud computing trust‐marks and a possible
industry self‐regulatory code of conduct. The recommendations are included in full in Attachment A.

2. The ITIIC recognises the significant work undertaken also by the Australian Government in producing the Cloud Computing Strategc Directions Paper and the importance of the ongoing work being done to implement it. It is supportive of further accelerating many aspects of this work, as per Recommendation 5 below.

3. The ITIIC recommend that the following actions be undertaken to address industry development issues within the sector.

a) That the Australian Government should strongly support the development of an enhanced local Cloud computing industry, building on the inherent strengths that the stable Australian financial, policy and regulatory environment provides. This environment will be further strengthened by developing guidelines for Cloud Service Providers to publically demonstrate cber‐security, provable maintenance of privacy of customer data, and guaranteed unencumbered (trusted) operation (Security/Privacy/Trust).

This recommendation is proposed based on the fact that the IT Industry Innovation Council considers that Australia has a natural dvantage in being a safe, secure destination for hosting of Cloud data and applications, particularly so given the regulatory environment of neighbouring countries and the geological stability of neighbouring countres in the Asia/pacific region. The recommendation is also based on the expectation that more and more users will move to a Cloud environment once Cloud servces are considered to be trustworthy. The recommendation is further based on the natural advantage Australia has with abundant renewable energy sources, including solar and geothermal, which would offer Cloud Service Providers the opportunity to reduce operational costs and support ecological “green” objectives.

Specific proposed activities to be led by the Australian government under this recommendation include:

i. Raise Australia's reputation as a safe and secure location for hosting cloud services with the goal of developing a compelling lobal brand that characterises Australia as the "Safe, Secure, Green Cloud" destination.

ii. Work closely with government, commercial and research organisations to establish a set of well‐informed and consistently applied accreditation guidelines for Cloud Service Providers to demonstrate Security/Privacy/Trust. The IT Industry Innovation Council would be pleased to be involved in this work and believe it would require:

a. A review and formulation a set of measures for Security/Privacy/Trust for Cloud Service Providers. It is extremely important that this be done in close co‐operation with Australian Government bodies such as AGIMO and the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner. It is also important to obtain input from Cloud Service Providers in the formulation process.

b. Working with major Cloud Service Providers to establish an agreed common set of validation tests (standards) against which they can state that they meet appropriate measures.

c. Engagement with a standards bodies, such as W3C (World Wide Web Consortium ‐ hosted by CSIRO in Australia), and the ACS (Australian Computer Society) to promote acceptance of such measures.

d. Establishment of a mechanism by which the measures and validation suite may be reviewed and refined/updated.

e. Establishment of a mechanism by which these measurements may be independently assessed.

f. Work closely with government, commercial and research organisations to establish a publically recognised set of marks which demonstrate levels of Security/Privacy/Trust, similar to the energy and water "Star‐Ratings" for household goods.

g. Development of associated and relevant underpinning themes, such as local clean energy capability and deep skills in the local industry to support the proposition.

h. Detailed consideration should be given to the value of making the ICT Industry (and its inherent linkage with both Cloud Computing and the Digital Economy) a key industry development priority area for the Australian Government, thereby raising its status in relation to the activities of associated agencies such as Austrade.

b) Through engagement with the relevant industry association’s focus on developing a plan to provide expertise and advice that wil enable the local ICT industry to transition to the Cloud.

c) That the Minister use the Enterprise Connect program to educate Australian Business on the business agility, transformational opportunities, and efficiencies offered in a Cloud based environment, and investigate opportunities through other existing government programs (digitalbusiness.gov.au, the Digital enterprises initiative, Supplier Advocate programme, etc.) to improve awareness and drive faster take‐up.

d) That Government, industry, CSIRO and NICTA collaborate and develop and execute a joint cloud computing research agenda. This agenda could include researching value and opportunities provided specifically for enhancing Australia’s reputation and cpability in a Cloud Computing global market including potential areas such as linkages of Cloud technologies with the NBN, leadership in applied usage of Cloud applications and innovative new Cloud software solutions for complex economic and communiy challenges.

4. The Department of IISR be included in the establishment of an ongoing Cloud Consultative Committee as proposed by the GAP Taskfrce (see Attachment A), and that it use its involvement to address issues such as alignment between the Cloud computing agenda and its association wit the NBN, the eight goals of the National Digital ...

From: Cloud Computing: Opportunities and Challenges, IT Industry Innovation Council, Australian Department of Innovation, 11 October 2011

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

ICT in the Australian Government

Greetings from the Australian Computer Society meeting in Canberra, where John Sheridan, First Assistant Secretary, Australian Government Information Management Office is talking on "Moving from Efficiency to Productivity". Jon paraphrased Peter Drucker, saying that productivity was not about making workers work harder, but managers manage better. John is a frequent contributor to the AGIMO Blog. John pointed out the the Gershon initiatives have now mostly been completed successfully.

Later work has been on the "COTS/GOTS" emphasizing the use of off the shelf applications with the minimum of customization. I see there was a ICT Customisation and Bespoke Development Policy, released October 16, 2009. John pointed out that common applications required common business processes and that this should be driven by the business, not the IT operations.

AGIMO released a Australian Government Cloud Computing Strategic Direction Paper on 14 Apr 2011. John pointed out that government's data storage is not "elastic" in that data is added, but not deleted for a very long time. As a result the ability of the "cloud" to rapidly increase and reduce data storage is not as applicable for government.

A revised Australian Government Open Source Software Policy was released on 27 January 2011. John argued that "Apps" for smart phones were more important to government than "open source". It was not clear what the connection, if any, between open source and apps was. Apps can be open source, or not. In my view organizations should look to build portable web based applications for mobile devices, before considering "apps". The difference is that a web application will run on desktop and laptop computers as well as smart phones and tablet computers. "Apps" will only run on the mobile platform they were designed for (usually Apple iPhone/iPad or Android). In most cases it would be unacceptable for government to limit the services it provides to those who just have Apple iPhones or just Android phones or even both.

The part of John;s talk which prompted the most audience questions was that of wide area network gateways. AGIMO has conducted a rationalization of government connections to the Internet.

John mentioned that Benchmarking for ICT will be released in about a month. Also green ICT benchmarks will be released as part of the overall sustainability. What I was not clear on was where the results of the ICT Sustianability inaitiaves are published. Each angeny is required to publish their results in their annual report, but are these consolidated somewhere in an overall government report? This information would be very useful for my ICT Sustainability students.

There is also "Programme and Project Management Maturity Model" (P3M3TM) reporting. John pointed out that all agencies do not have to have the top maturity raking to be doing a good job.

Work is proceeding on the Whole-of-Government ICT Services Panel (WISP) for 2012.
ICT Management SIG

AGIMO Update

AGIMO’s Vision & Plan for ICT in Government

John will discuss the status of current whole of government initiatives, including timeframes and outcomes, as well as how government is working with industry to deliver in the future.

John will talk about the role of AGIMO and how it continues to evolve to meet the changing demands of government.

Biography:

John Sheridan

First Assistant Secretar

John is currently the First Assistant Secretary Agency Services within AGIMO. His division’s responsibilities include whole of government matters such as australia.gov.au, Government 2.0, data centre strategy, coordinated procurement, improvements in the ICT industry marketplace, and telecommunications services including ICON, the Ministerial communications and telepresence networks.

John was also in charge of negotiating the Microsoft Volume Sourcing Agreement, valued at over $250m and providing services for over 230,000 staff and to successfully lead the effort to save $1 billion in ICT expenditure over 2009-2013.

Prior to this, John spent 22 in the Australian Army before joining and holding several senior roles within the ICT arm of Defence.

Wednesday, August 17, 2011

Plan Government ICT

John Sheridan, First Assistant Secretary, Australian Government Information Management Office, will talk on "AGIMO’s Vision & Plan for ICT in Government", at an Australian Computer Society meeting in Canberra, 20 September 2011:
ICT Management SIG
AGIMO Update

AGIMO’s Vision & Plan for ICT in Government

John will discuss the status of current whole of government initiatives, including timeframes and outcomes, as well as how government is working with industry to deliver in the future.

John will talk about the role of AGIMO and how it continues to evolve to meet the changing demands of government.

Biography:

John Sheridan

First Assistant Secretar

John is currently the First Assistant Secretary Agency Services within AGIMO. His division’s responsibilities include whole of government matters such as australia.gov.au, Government 2.0, data centre strategy, coordinated procurement, improvements in the ICT industry marketplace, and telecommunications services including ICON, the Ministerial communications and telepresence networks.

John was also in charge of negotiating the Microsoft Volume Sourcing Agreement, valued at over $250m and providing services for over 230,000 staff and to successfully lead the effort to save $1 billion in ICT expenditure over 2009-2013.

Prior to this, John spent 22 in the Australian Army before joining and holding several senior roles within the ICT arm of Defence.

Sunday, June 19, 2011

E-waste Rules from Indian Government

The Indian Ministry of Environment & Forests has announced that "E-waste Management and Handling Rules 2011" (S.O. 1035(E), Government of India Press, 12/05/2011) will come into effect 1 May 2012. These are useful rules for reducing the amount of toxic material from electronic devices polluting the environment, but the Indian government needs an on-line system to make the rules workable.

The rules apply to producers , bulk consumers and recycling centres for electrical and electronic equipment (batteries, small enterprises and radioactive waste are excluded). Under these rules producers are responsible for recycling of e-waste at the "end of life" of their products, including the cost of collection and recycling centres.

The rules are contained in a 23 page, 1.3Mb PDF file (also available in Hindi). Unfortunately the English version of the rules appears to be a poorly scanned facsimile of a paper copy. This will make it difficult for organizations to find the rules and prepare internal documentation in order to comply with them.

Organizations covered by these rules are required to register with their state pollution control board or Pollution Control Committee, keep records of e-waste handling and file annual returns with the government. Unfortunately the forms provided in the rules are poor quality facsimilies of paper copies. It appears that the Government of India's intention is that organizations will fill these forms in on paper and send them through the post. This will create a large administrative burden for the companies and government agencies concerned. It will also create an environmental burden due to the materials and energy consumed in the process. The paper based records produced will be of little value in monitoring e-waste.

I suggest the Government of India produce a central web based registration system for producers to register and enter their annual returns. Responsible agencies can then also register so they can monitor the activities in their region. The e-forms used could be design to be filled in using a smart phone or other low cost low bandwidth device, so minimal burden will be imposed on industry. The system could be self funding by including advertisements on the web site.

Monday, April 18, 2011

Use of the Skills Framework for the Information Age by Australian Governments

The "Whole-of-government ICT strategic workforce plan 2010-2013" from the Australian Public Service Commission The whole-of-government strategic ICT Workforce Plan was underpinned the Skills Framework for the Information Age (SFIA). SFIA originated in the UK and so, not surprisingly there are many more mentions of it on UK government web pages (97) than the USA (2). What is surprising is that there are even more on Austrlaian governments web pages (127). However, 90 of these are from the Queensland Government, 6 from the SA Government. Of the 6 federal government references, three are in APSC reports, one is the ACS Submission on Higher Education, and one an archived discussion if the UK's use of SFIA. There appears to be only one instance of the Austrlaian Government mentioning SFIA in a job related web page (by IP Australia). Link

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Australian Government ICT Strategic Vision

The Australian Government has released a Draft 2011 ICT Strategic Vision for comment. The document is available in PDF, DOC and RTF formats. Unfortunately the document is not in an efficient and easy to read format. Here is a web conversion of the DOC version of the document (without the images):


DRAFT: Strategic Vision for the Australian Government's use of ICT

Australian Government Information Management Office

April 2011

Creative Commons

With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted, this document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence.

The document should be attributed as Draft Strategic Vision for the Australian Government's use of ICT by the Department of Finance and Deregulation.

Use of the Coat of Arms

The terms under which the Coat of Arms can be used are detailed on the It's an Honour website.

Inquiries regarding the licence and any use of the document are welcome at:

Assistant Secretary

Governance and Policy Branch

Australian Government Information Management Office

Department of Finance and Deregulation

John Gorton Building

King Edward Terrace Parkes ACT 2600

Email: ICTStrategy@finance.gov.au

Table of Contents

Contents

Executive Summary - The ICT Strategic Vision

"ICT will increase public sector productivity by enabling the delivery of world leading government services for Australian people, communities and businesses, supporting open engagement to better inform decisions, and improving the operations of government."

Why do we need an ICT Strategic Vision?

Today, the machinery of government depends on ICT. ICT will continue to transform government business and services to meet people's expectations for better services, and to create a more open Government. Research points to the important role that ICT plays in driving productivity. ICT capital investment has contributed 17.5% of the total Australian productivity improvements since 19851 - it therefore warrants our close attention.

The Government's use of ICT is largely agency focussed. The ICT Reform Program and coordinated ICT procurement arrangements have achieved greater integration, cooperation, and transparency. However, more visibility of the ICT design and investment intentions between government agencies is desirable. Decisions to acquire or upgrade ICT systems should consider the broader implications for government, people and business.

Rapid changes in the technology landscape continue, including the increasing use by business of technology developed for personal use, social media, mobile services, broadband and cloud computing. These changes can profoundly influence government and industry choices for ICT investment and how services can be delivered. The Government needs to balance the potential gains from innovation in ICT with the need to provide stable and reliable operations and services.

How will the ICT Strategic Vision address these challenges?

The 2011 ICT Strategic Vision refocuses the Government's ICT priority to improving productivity by delivering better services to people, communities, and business, engaging openly and improving government operations. The Vision is for streamlined interaction within government and between Government, people and business. This builds on and extends the gains made through the ICT Reform Program that focussed on the efficiency of ICT operations and building agency capability.

The Government will deliver the Vision and increase productivity through three strategic priorities - Deliver better services, Engage openly, and Improve government operations. Two strategic actions support the implementation of each strategic priority.

Figure 1: The ICT Strategic Vision


A text description of this image is included at Appendix A.

Deliver Better Services

People expect high quality, easy to use government services. Implementing the vision will deliver on this expectation. We will build capability in government to better meet people's needs and deliver improved services. The Vision builds on the Government's investment in the National Broadband Network, to improve the delivery of services to all Australians.

The strategic actions to deliver better services are:

  • building capability across government to use ICT in order to achieve improved services, effectiveness and efficiencies;

  • enabling better services by using ICT to simplify and integrate government services to both people and business while maintaining necessary security and privacy.

Engage Openly

The Government is committed to the implementation of transparency reforms announced under the Declaration of Open Government and reforms to the Freedom of Information Act. Better access to and use of government information through services including data.gov.au will support policy analysis and improve government decision making. Government will use Web 2.0 and other tools to build new systems faster, improve collaboration internally and extend its reach outwards.

The strategic actions to engage openly are:

  • creating knowledge to share and manage information and knowledge to improve decision-making and drive economic growth;

  • collaborating effectively by building better partnerships to improve the effectiveness of government consultations and service delivery.

Improve Government Operations

Continuing fiscal constraint will require the Government to make the most effective use of existing and new ICT investments. Better understanding how policy implementation influences technology decisions will help achieve greater value. The Vision encourages greater innovation in government operations, to enable cost effective solutions.

The strategic actions to improve government operations are:

  • investing optimally to enable more effective implementation of policy by targeting ICT investments that deliver the greatest value ;

  • encouraging innovation so that government can harness the full potential of the digital economy and enhanced technology solutions to deliver services more efficiently and effectively.

I: The Need for Change

The technology landscape is characterised by continuous and rapid change. The internet has changed the way we access travel, banking, information, shopping and government services.

The change has been dramatic and occurred over a very short period of time. This pace of change is expected to continue if not accelerate. Smaller devices, increasingly mobile technologies, technology that predicts what you want based on your personal preferences, will influence delivery of government services.

The Australian Government will use new technologies to deliver better services and to improve government operations. The Government will be an early adopter of technology that will make it easier for people and businesses to access services while carefully considering the risks of new technologies to security and privacy.

Australians, our communities and businesses have incorporated technology solutions and the internet into their lives. Our society and economy depend on ICT for services such as banking, online purchasing, invoicing and payment, email and social networking. People and business2 expect good quality and highly available government services and measure government performance against private sector services such as banking and airline bookings. ICT is embedded in government operations and, without it, the delivery of government services would not be possible.

Continuing rapid changes to the technology landscape, and opportunities to improve Government operations and service delivery that build on the ICT Reform Program, highlight the need for a new strategic vision for ICT.

ICT has the potential to transform government business and services to improve productivity, meet people's expectations for better services, and create a more open Government. The 2011 ICT Strategic Vision provides the direction for ICT investment, capability development, and transformation to support and enhance government services and operations for the next five years.

The technology landscape

Rapid changes in the technology landscape, including the growth in the use by business of consumer technology, mobile services, broadband, and cloud computing are already influencing Government choices on how services can be delivered, and which ICT investments to make.

Consumer technology is in many ways driving the adoption of new tools by government and establishing a platform for innovation. People have high expectations that the services they receive from Government will be the equivalent of private sector offerings. Staff expect that the technology provided in their workplace will be no less capable than that which they use at home.

Broadband networks, fixed and mobile, have become critical enablers to the adoption of many consumer technologies3. This has led to the creation of new capabilities within Government, such as the Centrelink Bus. This mobile Centrelink office can support service delivery remotely and in times of crisis. Today, citizens are effectively always online and expect the same of government.

The current Government ICT environment

Since 2008, the Government has had a strong focus on improving the efficiency of its ICT operations and building the capability of Government agencies.

The ICT Reform Program delivered improved agency capability to manage large ICT enabled programs, $1 billion in efficiencies from agency ICT business as usual operations, and will avoid $1 billion in costs through a coordinated approach to data centres.

The Government continues to use its buying power to drive cost reductions and has already saved in excess of $50 million from whole of government coordinated procurements of Microsoft licenses and desktop hardware. The Government will consider new coordinated procurement arrangements to achieve more benefits in the future.

The Government will adopt new approaches, such as cloud computing, where appropriate and share technology capabilities across agencies to make better use of investments and deliver greater value for money.

The ICT Reform Program4 has implemented improved capability, focussed attention on ICT sustainability, accelerated a whole-of-government approach to data centres, and provided better information on agency ICT costs. Coordinated ICT procurement has delivered efficiencies in high volume, high cost areas such as Microsoft licensing, telecommunications, desktops and data centres.

Agencies are implementing the Portfolio Programme Project Management Maturity Model (P3M3)5 to measure their organisational capability to deliver ICT investments and using this information to plan improvements in capability where required. Large agency ICT enabled investments seeking Budget funding are scrutinised and further refined through the ICT Two-Pass Review Process6 and their progress monitored through Gateway Reviews. However, a significant portion of agency ICT investment and capability is not visible beyond individual agencies, which restricts opportunities to use existing investments to improve ICT operations.

Decisions about ICT are often focussed on individual agencies. Such technology decisions should fully appreciate the wider implications or opportunity costs and constraining technology options and capabilities. Similarly, decisions should consider exploring capability that exists elsewhere in government. There is a need to ensure that other decisions - where complex rules can make policy implementation, and the technology that supports it, difficult and expensive to deliver - consider the technology implications.

The review of the implementation of the ICT Reform Program conducted in 20107, found that the "...very substantial implementation effort has positioned the Government for the next phase in the evolution of ICT policy and practice. There has been very substantial effort invested across Government in putting the recommendations of the Gershon Report into practice. The challenge now is to leverage that effort to enable Government to deliver different and better services and to engage more closely with its citizens."

The Government will continue to closely monitor and manage its ICT skills through government-wide ICT workforce planning to ensure the delivery and support of Government programs.

The Vision focuses the Government's use of ICT on increasing productivity by improving service delivery, improving government operations, exploring innovative approaches and novel applications to better meet the needs of citizens, communities and business.

The Government regularly reviews ICT skills levels and monitors the potential impact on the delivery of government services.

Demand for skilled ICT workers is growing while ICT student numbers in tertiary institutions are falling. The Australian Government recognises that a skilled ICT workforce is a critical enabler to improving government operations and enabling better delivery of government services to the community.

The Government is managing its ICT skills with government-wide skills-based programs aimed at attracting, recruiting and retaining skilled ICT staff in the APS. These initiatives include ICT entry-level programs for apprentices and cadets, mentoring programs and an ICT teleworking policy.

II: The Vision

"ICT will increase public sector productivity by enabling the delivery of world leading government services for Australian people, communities and businesses, supporting open engagement to better inform decisions, and improving the operations of government."

The 2011 ICT Strategic Vision provides the direction for the Government's use of ICT for the next five years. It signals a shift of emphasis from ICT efficiency to improved productivity. The Government will use ICT to deliver better services and improve operations and processes aligned with Government policy. More targeted consultation and collaboration, increased availability and use of government information and a stronger understanding of ICT capability will inform Government policy development.

"By 2016, a newer generation of government leaders will measure their IT leaders by the productivity IT brings to the public sector service delivery rather than just the efficiency of IT."

Peter Sondergaard, SVP, Research, Gartner (16 Nov 2010)

ICT and Productivity

Improvements in government operations and services have a significant effect on the productivity of the nation. The Government's use of ICT provides an opportunity to improve our national productivity by making government more efficient and streamlining government processes and people's interactions with government. Fewer and simpler interactions with government will allow people and businesses to increase their productivity, and as a consequence, that of the nation. This aligns with the efforts of Government to reduce "red tape" in order to streamline government and business operations and service delivery.

ICT is an important driver of productivity. The Productivity Commission8 has identified that investment in ICT capital results in improved labour productivity as well as directly enabling innovation. The OECD has found that ICT capital investment in Australia contributed to 17.5% of total Australian GDP growth between 1985 and 20069,10 an annual average of 0.57%. This effect is supported by various reports and research, including:

  • The 2009 Access Economics reports Revitalising Australia's Productivity Growth11 and The economic benefits of intelligent technologies, which both identify improvements in productivity arising from the use of intelligent technologies in the electricity, irrigation, health, transport and broadband sectors;

  • The Telstra Productivity Indicator Report12, which provides evidence that ICT has improved productivity in the majority of the top 300 Australian companies; and

  • The vast majority of witness statements and evidence provided to the Parliamentary Inquiry into raising the productivity growth rate in the Australian economy13.

The Council of Australian Governments' National Partnership Agreement identified 27 deregulation priorities14 to increase national productivity. This demonstrates COAG's commitment to the reforms necessary to boost productivity and workforce participation, and improve delivery of services to the community. ICT is core to achieving these aims. The Standard Business Reporting15 program is an example of government helping business to reduce regulatory costs. It offers streamlined lodgement of reports and avoids the costs of duplicate reporting to improve the productivity of business and the broader economy.

Strategic Actions

The Vision has three strategic priorities and six strategic actions to support the primary objective of increased productivity. The graphic below shows how these elements align:

Figure 2: Alignment of the Strategic Priorities and Strategic Actions


A text description of this image is included at Appendix A.

Government will deliver better services to support productivity growth through more effective use of the Government's ICT capability. ICT will enable services that are streamlined and easy for people and business to use and will deliver greater productivity.

Government will use Web 2.0 tools as part of its consultation processes to deliver better services by engaging more effectively with internal and external stakeholders, and making better use of the information arising from interactions.

Government will improve its operations by actively encouraging innovation and making better use of existing and new ICT capability investments. It will improve the way it identifies how to get the most value from its investments. This will include guiding and helping to shape policy choices to better use existing capabilities, speed delivery, avoid unnecessary duplication and complexity, and make best use of new and emerging technologies.

Figure 1 (repeated): The ICT Strategic Vision


A text description of this image is included at Appendix A.

III: Deliver Better Services

The 2011 ICT Strategic Vision promotes simpler, easier to access and use government services where and when people want them, whenever possible. Government will make better use of ICT investments in order to better meet the expectations and needs of people and business, as well as those working in government agencies. The Vision also supports Government priorities, such as the National Broadband Network, by encouraging the improvement and delivery of government services online. This is consistent with the expectations of people and business, and the recent Gov 2.0 and APS reforms. The strategic actions to deliver better, more convenient and easier to use services focus on building and using ICT capability.

Expectations

People and business expect high quality government services that are convenient and simple to use. Our services are frequently judged and measured against those of the private sector, especially banks, airlines and hotels. This means that in developing new policies, Government will work with a broad range of interest groups using a range of targeted consultation approaches, including Web 2.0 tools, to gather views on how policy will best be delivered. Complex policies are often difficult to deliver simply - this is why ICT needs to be considered as an integral part of policy reform, capability development and investment planning.

The Government can use ICT to deliver integrated services to people by enabling a range of "self-service" channels. This includes giving people options to link services across agencies, assisting people to find information and services offered by government, and reducing the "Ëœred tape' and compliance burden. Reducing the regulatory burden on people, non-profit organisations and businesses supports increased productivity.

The use of ICT provides opportunities to continue to improve service delivery by moving to a "tell us once" approach. This provides people the option - entirely within the control of citizens - to access government services through a secure logon to government, and joined up government services across Australian, State and Territory, and Local government jurisdictions.

National Broadband Network

The National Broadband Network (NBN) is the largest single investment in infrastructure undertaken in Australia. The Australian Government's commitment to its construction mirrors the importance Government places on ICT for our future prosperity. The NBN provides a critical enabling platform for further improving the delivery of both current and future government services.

Australian Public Service Reform

The 2009 review of the Australian Public Service (APS) proposed a comprehensive reform agenda in its report "Ahead of the Game: Blueprint for the Reform of Australian Government Administration"16. The recommendations, all of which have been accepted by the Government, build the capability and productivity of the APS through increased collaboration and innovation. These improvements will increase the quality of advice to government on and government service delivery.

We will know we have succeeded when

Online services will be easier to access and use, personalised and consistent across government agencies. Agency boundaries will increasingly cease to be visible to people and business. People will increasingly access government online services for the majority of their day-to-day engagements with Government. People's use of government online services and their satisfaction level with services will increase.

Strategic Action One: Building capability

Government will build capability to use ICT in order to achieve improved services, productivity, and efficiencies.

Government ICT capability is critical to the successful delivery of services and achieving improvements in public sector productivity. A significant amount of this ICT capability is either duplicated or under-utilised. The Vision is to increase the utilisation and effectiveness of this capability, with a greater emphasis on meeting the expectations and needs of people and business.

Strong governance drives the strategic direction and coordinated use of government ICT assets. The Secretaries ICT Governance Board (SIGB) will continue to support the Government and agencies on whole-of-government ICT priorities, investments, and arrangements. The Department of Finance and Deregulation will continue to play a leadership role in identifying, and building whole-of-government ICT capability.

Where Government has invested in an ICT capability, this capability will be made available to other agencies to avoid duplication and re-work. Strong governance will be applied to common ICT capabilities to reduce fragmentation and duplication. Cloud computing will be used where appropriate, consistent with privacy and security considerations, to add new capability and capacity, as well as drive down costs.

Demographic and social trends point to future technology skills shortages. Since 2007, the Government has had an extensive program in place to address these skills shortages, and this will continue. Where agencies have developed key areas of skill and expertise Government will consider how they can share these skills and expertise across government and with other agencies.

Cloud computing uses internet technologies to deliver computing as a service. Cloud computing is not a new technology. Cloud computing provides a method of accessing software, hardware and storage solutions in a convenient, on-demand and flexible way.

Australian Government agencies may use cloud computing where it provides greater value for money than the alternatives, and is appropriately secure.

While the potential for flexible and cost-efficient computing solutions offered by cloud computing is attractive, the Australian Government will not compromise the security of its operations or the privacy of people and businesses.

Action program

The actions to implement the objectives of the building capability program are set out below:

1.1

Improve utilisation of existing technology capability

  • Use a lead agency model to develop new technology capability where there are gaps and share technology capabilities across agencies.

  • Reuse and share investments by increasing awareness and use of existing technology capabilities across agencies.

  • Simplify and make consistent business processes for common activities across agencies to enable improved and more standardised approaches to service delivery and ICT capability.

1.2

Technology and Policy integration and delivery

  • Build the consideration of ICT capability into policy development and implementation to ensure that policy decisions are delivered in the most effective and timely way and opportunity costs are recognised.

1.3

Improve Government program delivery capability

  • Build capability across Government and its partners to manage and deliver ICT enabled programs and projects

1.4

Develop ICT workforce skills and utilisation

  • Build on existing ICT workforce planning approaches to make better use of the ICT skilled workforce across government.

Strategic Action Two: Enabling better services

Government will enable better services by using ICT to simplify government services to people, communities and business while maintaining necessary security and privacy.

The Government is committed to improving the delivery of services. The Vision is for simple, easy to use services that deliver coordinated transactions to people independent of the structure of government. These services will be available through fewer websites, with australia.gov.au a primary online entry point. People will be able to consent to agencies sharing data, within security and privacy constraints, to enable a "tell us once" approach. This will involve seamless service delivery across Australian, State and Territory, and Local government jurisdictions, over time.

Online services will be simpler and easier to use under appropriate security and privacy constraints. People will be able to complete transactions, when and how best meets their needs, to the extent that technology allows. The NBN, in particular, will make possible the delivery of new online services to people and businesses throughout Australia, including those in rural and remote areas.

People will be able to access services across agencies through a single logon should they wish to link their dealings with various government agencies. Where possible, and based on consent, information and services will be delivered and supported by automated processes.

Australian businesses will have online access to a range of government transactions using published standards and protocols to simplify their dealings with Government.

Action program

To enable better services the following actions will be undertaken:

2.1

Deliver simple and easy to use online services

  • Deliver automated online services that allow people to tell government once of a change in circumstance such as address, and new government service directories to help people find the services they need.

  • Build on the current australia.gov.au homepage to simplify people's access to government online services.

  • Provide people and business with a logon that allows them to consent to sharing information so that government can provide better, integrated services.

2.2

Deliver more personalised services

  • Build services to capture, understand, and deliver people's preferences when dealing with government.

2.3

Simplify government websites

  • Reduce the number of websites and exploit online services via the australia.gov.au account.

  • Create a common look and feel to all government websites that is accessible to all Australians.

2.4

Increase the automation of services

  • Automate processes to improve the interactions between people, business and government.

IV: Engage Openly

The Government is committed to the implementation of transparency reforms announced under the Declaration of Open Government and the Freedom of Information Act. More open, transparent engagement and improved access and availability of government information, as well as being an important goal in its own right, will stimulate more effective consultation and collaboration informing service design. The strategic actions necessary for open and transparent engagement include the greater availability and use of ICT to enable information and knowledge creation, sharing and management.

Openness and Transparency

The Australian Government's Declaration of Open Government17 requires agencies to reduce barriers to online engagement, undertake social networking and online collaboration projects and support online engagement by employees, in accordance with the Australian Public Service Commission Guidelines.

The Gov 2.0 agenda, lead by the Department of Finance and Deregulation, champions the value of data, transparency, and targeted consultation processes using web tools to support policy development. The Government has created an Australian Office of the Information Commissioner, appointed its first Information Commissioner, and updated the Freedom of Information Act, in part, to meet these aims.

We will know we have succeeded when

The use of web tools to undertake targeted consultations between people and government will be the normal way to support the development of new policies and services. Government will have developed capacity and skills to manage open engagement processes supporting by a range of standard approaches, including Web 2.0 tools. People will have access to high quality data from government and other sources to support this and to help identify new, more productive ways to deliver services.

The Declaration of Open Government, made in July 2010 formally marked the beginning of the implementation by the Australian Government of its response to the Government 2.0 Taskforce. Working with the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner, agencies are beginning to release more data online at sites like data.australia.gov.au. Agencies are also increasingly using Gov 2.0 techniques to inform and consult with citizens on a range of policy related matters. Early take up has been strong. In early 2011, the blog platform govspace.gov.au supports over 20 agency sites with as many again in development. Other social networking tools have also been used by agencies such as Centrelink and the Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy to provide information to their stakeholders in both routine and more urgent matters.

While much of the implementation is ahead, some lessons have already been learnt:

  1. Focussed consultative periods produce better results than open-ended activities.

  2. The online community, while growing quickly, represents only part of the community as a whole and consultation cannot be restricted to one channel.

  3. Social networks are generally self-regulating over time but vocal, even strident, commentators can sometimes dominate conversations in the short term. Management of these conversations, including effective moderation, is a key skill.

  4. The immediacy of the online platform, while accelerating timelines, cannot be allowed to overwhelm other work. Expected response timings and methods need to be clearly outlined at the outset.

The Vision reflects these lessons in outlining how the Government will use Gov 2.0 to improve engagement with Australian people, communities, and businesses.

Strategic Action Three: Creating knowledge

Creating, sharing and managing information and knowledge to improve decision-making and drive economic growth.

Government manages extensive information and knowledge resources that are critical to policy development and decision making enabling government services to be targeted based on need. As recognised by the Gov 2.0 Taskforce18, this data also has additional economic value that can only be realised when it is made available to those that can benefit from it. This view of the additional value that can be generated by greater access and availability to information and knowledge resources can also be applied to Government itself. Government will in future make better use of its information and knowledge resources (within necessary security and policy constraints) to inform policy decisions and improve service delivery and the operations of government.

Government will capture and publish data using agreed standards and build skills both internally and externally to interpret information and knowledge resources to improve policy and services.

Government will continue to make data available to people and business through data.gov.au to drive greater openness and transparency in support of the goals expressed in the Declaration of Open Government. Increased availability of government data will optimise its economic and social value and enable third parties to use information and knowledge resources to innovate and create additional value.

The Government will also make greater use of location-based information to inform policy development and service delivery.

Respecting and protecting the privacy and information security of Australian people, community and business is fundamental to government operations and service delivery.

As part of the Government's broader initiatives to improve online security, agencies will continue to work with the Australian Information Commissioner and relevant security agencies to protect personal and sensitive information.

The Government will continue to enhance the security of government systems to build Australians' trust and confidence in government operations and service delivery.

Action program

To create the proposed knowledge based environment the following actions will be undertaken:

3.1

Build business intelligence

  • With regard for privacy and security, create a holistic view of customer needs within government to improve targeting and delivery of services.

3.2

Use location based information

  • Develop standards and a whole-of-government direction for the use of location based information across agencies.

3.3

Develop tools and platforms to analyse data

  • Create capability within government to capture, share as appropriate, and analyse customer information so that trends can be identified and used to better inform policy development.

3.4

Release public sector information

  • Continue the Gov 2.0 release of government data publicly for wider use to share information and knowledge resources and unlock economic and social value.

Strategic Action Four: Collaborating effectively

Government will build better partnerships and use Web 2.0 tools to undertake targeted consultations to improve policy decisions, service delivery, and ICT investment outcomes .

The Government will build on existing partnerships and approaches to collaboration both within and external to government. Government will conduct targeted consultations with people, communities and businesses using tools such as blogs, wikis, social networking sites and micro blogging. Government will use this information as one of several methods to identify existing needs and future trends to improve services and policies, and drive innovation.

Web 2.0 tools enable communities of interest to develop rapidly and to find people with local knowledge or technical expertise to build understanding of issues and solve problems as they emerge. They enable communities to filter information on the internet and identify the most useful information to meet their needs. They also enable people to find the most knowledgeable and valuable contributors in any given subject area, from those with international professional and academic reputations to those who possess significant local and community subject matter knowledge and expertise19.

Government will use Web 2.0 tools to engage in a targeted way with business, academic, and other expert groups to address service delivery challenges. Government will promote the development of these engagements through the targeted use of social networking tools and the technology demonstrator programs. Policies will be informed by new and emerging ICT capability and innovation.

Action program

The following actions will be undertaken to improve the effectiveness of government collaboration:

4.1

Strengthen external collaboration networks

  • Use Web 2.0 and other tools in a targeted way to engage with people and business to improve policy development and service delivery.

  • Actively participate in external blogging forums to promote wide community engagement.

4.2

Build collaboration capability across government sector

  • Create online communities of expertise based around common business processes to develop and share standardised approaches.

4.3

Build the channels needed for government to collaborate

  • Explore partnerships with industry, academics, the community and third sector, and with agents and brokers to inform policy and deliver services.

V: Improve Government Operations

The Vision focuses on improving the productivity of government operations through more targeted ICT investment enabling more efficient and effective business processes. Continuing fiscal constraint will place pressure on Government, at least in the medium term, to make better use of ICT capability and investments. The strategic actions necessary to improve government operations involve better targeting ICT investment to drive greater efficiency and productivity in government operations and encouraging innovation by government and third parties. This will result in:

  • better-informed executives, managers and governance bodies,

  • well analysed and soundly developed investment proposals,

  • awareness and understanding of alternative approaches and solutions, and

  • better awareness of the cost implications of decisions on other parties and policies, especially where ICT choices impose costs elsewhere or reduce the flexibility or value that can be delivered.

ICT coordinated procurements establish whole-of-government arrangements for the purchasing of commonly used ICT goods and services.

Existing Australian Government ICT coordinated procurement arrangements for desktop computing, telecommunications, data centre services and software have delivered savings to agencies of up to 30 per cent on previous costs.

The Australian Government remains committed to deliver efficiencies and savings in ICT costs where possible, to increase the standardisation of government technology purchasing, and to simplify the process for suppliers and vendors.

In consultation with the Australian Information Industry Association and the Australian Industry Group, the Government has also developed a set of Principles of Engagement on ICT to help improve the operation of the government ICT marketplace.

Fiscal constraint

As a result of the Global Financial Crisis most OECD countries are applying significant fiscal restraint as they attempt to recover from the downturn in the global economy. The Global Financial Crisis coincided with the Government's ICT Reform Program that included a strong focus on the efficient use of ICT in business as usual activities and coordinated procurement of ICT. The Government's medium term fiscal strategy20 requires continued strong fiscal discipline, and the need to maximise the return from existing ICT capability and future investments.

Innovation

The 2009 Department of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research publication Powering Ideas: An Innovation Agenda for the 21st Century21 sets out a ten-year vision to strengthen innovation and increase productivity. It identifies the importance of ICT and business management to innovation. The Management Advisory Committee's report Empowering Change22 suggests options for how the Australian Public Sector can use innovation to improve the quality of policy and service delivery outputs. Research conducted by the OECD23, supported by local organisations24,25, demonstrates that ICT has a significant impact on both product and process innovation.

The efficiency and effectiveness of government operations.

Better decisions when investing in ICT can reduce the costs of administration and delivering services. Accordingly, good Government policy and service design must be informed by ICT capability. This includes opportunities to ensure implementation options, cost, user value, and experience, and desired program outcomes are properly considered.

Better, more informed, decisions when investing in ICT can significantly reduce the costs of administration, service delivery and enterprise debt.

We will know we have succeeded when

Government ICT investments are targeted based on need and value. Policy development will recognise the opportunity cost to government, people and business. ICT capabilities will be used by multiple agencies under agreed governance arrangements. Government will use new and innovative approaches based on technologies that improve operations and services. Government ICT performance measured through annual ICT benchmarking reports will reflect consistent, efficient operations.

Strategic Action Five: Investing optimally

Government will invest optimally by targeting ICT investment to the areas that deliver the greatest value and enable a better, more effective implementation of policy decisions.

Government has rigorous ICT investment processes that include benchmarking, and the ICT Two-Pass Review Process. The Vision builds on this through greater coordination of ICT investment planning while maintaining the balance between a distributed and central approach - balancing the need for innovation with the need for greater commonality, efficiency, and re-use.

To achieve this balance there will be more transparency around the Government's ICT activities, investments and plans, especially for common or generic systems such as human resource and financial management. Annual ICT benchmarking will be refined to provide detailed information on agency ICT activities, investments and plans. Greater transparency of agency ICT activities and plans will lead to better strategic investments focussing on, in order of preference, re-using existing capability, modifying existing capability or buying or building new capability for use across multiple agencies. This will include consideration of how best to deliver ICT capability to smaller agencies.

Greater transparency of existing ICT activities and investments will also better inform policy decisions. Government needs to understand the true cost and implications of policy options and the consequences that might arise from decisions when they are implemented in ICT systems.

The use of commodity hardware, off-the-shelf software, virtualisation, and cloud computing, for example, will drive increased capability and efficiency through reduced customisation and integration costs. Extending the coordinated approach to ICT procurement will allow for greater efficiencies during product procurement and refresh. Government will continue to use its advantage as a large-scale purchaser of ICT to reduce the duplication of agency procurement effort and simplify suppliers' involvement in procurement.

Action program

The actions to achieve the objectives of the proposed investment program are set out below:

5.1

Better Investment governance and information

  • Increase the visibility of agency ICT activities, investments and plans to reduce duplication.

  • Improve ICT investment by considering alternate approaches, and greater acceptance of risk on the ability to deliver effective value for money solutions.

5.2

Portfolio ICT investment

  • Develop a portfolio approach to strategic ICT investments.

  • Target ICT investments to develop and use whole-of-government capabilities.

5.3

Extend coordinated ICT procurement

  • Target new areas for coordinated ICT procurement to reduce costs and remove duplication while delivering current initiatives such as the data centre strategy.

5.4

Share computing resources and services

  • Consider cloud computing to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government's ICT operations.

  • Explore opportunities for shared back-office corporate IT operations and ICT services.

Strategic Action Six: Encouraging innovation

Government will encourage innovation to harness the full potential of the digital economy and technology innovation.

The Government has a significant program of work underway to foster innovation. The Departments of Innovation, Industry, Science and Research and Education, Employment and Workplace Relations, the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), and National ICT Australia (NICTA) all contribute to the development of innovative ICT solutions for government and the broader economy.

The Government will use information about people's expectations and preferences to identify and inform the development of new services, and improve existing services. New business models enabled by technologies such as cloud computing and the NBN, will be used to build efficient, flexible, and responsive systems to deliver innovative services to people, communities and business.

Government, in partnership with the ICT industry, will use technology demonstrator hubs to build and trial innovative services and processes to address the complex service delivery challenges that it faces. Government, where appropriate, will test these innovations through a concept viability program with industry before going to market to tender for solutions. Government will also seek innovative options from its strategic partners in the ICT and related industries.

The growth in public sector information available on data.gov.au will allow third parties to develop innovative applications and services to complement government services. Engaging with people using Gov 2.0 and other contemporary engagement and communication approaches when developing policies and services will encourage innovation. Having people participate in this way will generate a whole range of ideas and possibilities for application in the public sector.

Action program

To achieve the innovation aims the actions below will be initiated:

6.1

Open ICT development to foster innovation

  • Generate ideas through challenges and competitions, such as GovHack and MashupAustralia, to create opportunities for external and internal ICT innovation.

6.2

Deliver new and better ICT enabled services

  • Use the NBN to make more government services available online.

6.3

Increase awareness and early take-up of new ICT

  • Use Technology Demonstration Hubs, in partnership with industry, to seek and share information about new technologies.

6.4

Examine and adopt new and emerging technologies more rapidly

  • Quickly adopt new ICT models through a risk-based approach that balances issues of performance, usability, security, privacy and investment.

  • Promote the use of flexible development methodologies, and agency based innovation communities of practice so that new technologies and ideas can be deployed rapidly and assessed for their business use.

VI: Implementing the ICT Vision

The Implementation Road Map

Strategic Priority: Deliver Better Services; Strategic Action: Building Capability

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

1.1

Improve utilisation of existing technology capability

Use a lead agency model to develop new technology capability where there are gaps and share technology capabilities across agencies.

2012 onwards



Reuse and share investments by increasing awareness and use of existing technology capabilities across agencies.

2012 onwards



Simplify and make consistent business processes for common activities across agencies to enable improved and more standardised approaches to service delivery and ICT capability.

2013 onwards

1.2

Technology and Policy integration and delivery

Build the consideration of ICT capability into policy development and implementation to ensure that policy decisions are delivered in the most effective and timely way and opportunity costs are recognised.

2012

1.3

Improve Government program delivery capability

Build capability across government and its partners to manage and deliver ICT enabled programs and projects

2011 onwards

1.4

Develop ICT workforce skills and utilisation

Build on existing ICT workforce planning approaches to make better use of the ICT skilled workforce across government.

2011 onwards

Strategic Priority: Deliver Better Services; Strategic Action: Enabling better services

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

2.1

Deliver simple and easy to use online services

Deliver automated online services that allow people to tell government once of a change in circumstance such as address, and new government service directories to help people find the services they need.

2012 onwards



Build on the current australia.gov.au homepage to simplify people's access to government online services

2011 onwards



Provide people and business with a logon that allows them to consent to sharing information so that government can provide better, integrated services.

2012

2.2

Deliver more personalised services to people

Build services to capture, understand, and deliver people's preferences when dealing with government.

2012 onwards

2.3

Simplify Government websites

Reduce the number of websites and exploit online services via the australia.gov.au account.

2013



Create a common look and feel to all government websites that is accessible to all Australians.

2013

2.4

Increase the automation of services

Automate processes to improve the interactions between people, business and government.

2011 onwards

Strategic Priority: Engage Openly; Strategic Action: Creating knowledge

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

3.1

Build business intelligence

With regard for privacy and security, create a holistic view of customer needs within government to improve targeting and delivery of services.

2013 onwards

3.2

Use location information

Develop standards and a whole-of-government direction for the use of location based information across agencies.

2012 onwards

3.3

Develop tools and platforms to analyse data

Create capability within government to capture, share as appropriate, and analyse customer information so that trends can be identified and used to better inform policy development.

2013 onwards

3.4

Release public sector information

Continue the Gov 2.0 release of government data publicly for wider use to share information and knowledge resources and unlock economic and social value.

2011 onwards

Strategic Priority: Engage Openly; Strategic Action: Collaborating Effectively

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

4.1

Strengthen external collaboration networks

Use Web 2.0 and other tools in a targeted way to engage with people and business to improve policy development and service delivery.

2011 onwards



Actively participate in external blogging forums to promote wide community engagement.

2011 onwards

4.2

Build collaboration capability across government sector

Create online communities of expertise based around common business processes to develop and share standardised approaches.

2011 onwards

4.3

Build the channels needed for government to collaborate

Explore partnerships with industry, academics, the community and third sector, and with agents and brokers to inform policy and deliver services.

2011 onwards

Strategic Priority: Improve Government Operations; Strategic Action: Investing Optimally

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

5.1

Better Investment governance and information

Increase the visibility of agency ICT activities, investments and plans to reduce duplication.

2011 onwards



Improve ICT investment by considering alternate approaches, and greater acceptance of risk on the ability to deliver effective value for money solutions.

2012 onwards

5.2

Portfolio ICT investment

Develop a portfolio approach to strategic ICT investments. Target ICT investments to develop and use whole-of-government capabilities.

2012 onwards

5.3

Extend coordinated ICT procurement

Target new areas for coordinated ICT procurement to reduce costs and remove duplication while delivering current initiatives such as the data centre strategy.

2011 onwards

5.4

Share computing resources and services

Consider cloud computing to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government's ICT operations.

2011 onwards



Explore opportunities for shared back-office corporate IT operations and ICT services.

2012 onwards

Strategic Priority: Improve Government Operations; Strategic Action: Encouraging Innovation

Serial

Actions

Activities

Timeline

6.1

Open ICT development to foster innovation

Generate ideas through challenges and competitions, such as GovHack and MashupAustralia, to create opportunities for external and internal ICT innovation.

2011 onwards

6.2

Deliver new and better ICT enabled services

Use the NBN to make more government services available online.

2012 onwards

6.3

Increase awareness and early take-up of new ICT

Use Technology Demonstration Hubs, in partnership with industry, to seek and share information about new technologies.

2013 onwards

6.4

Examine and adopt new and emerging technologies more rapidly

Quickly adopt new ICT models through a risk-based approach that balances issues of performance, usability, security, privacy and investment.

2012 onwards



Promote the use of flexible development methodologies, and agency based innovation communities of practice so that new technologies and ideas can be deployed rapidly and assessed for their business use.

2012 onwards

Implementation Governance

The 2011 ICT Strategic Vision provides the Government's vision and direction for the use of ICT for the next five years.

Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (FMA Act) agencies will implement the Vision and the Government's ICT work program. Defence and Australian intelligence community agencies will implement the strategic actions of the Vision that are relevant to them in respect of their administrative, financial, personnel and other non-specialist and non-defence capability ICT systems.

The Secretaries' ICT Governance Board (SIGB) will continue to support the Government and agencies on whole-of-government ICT priorities, investments, and arrangements. The SIGB will oversight the implementation of the 2011 ICT Strategic Vision and the Government's ICT work program. The SIGB has a close link with the Secretaries Committee on Service Delivery, particularly for ICT enabled improvements to government services.

The Chief Information Officer Committee (CIOC) reports to SIGB. CIOC considers ICT matters including technical, operational and business related issues and provides advice and guidance to SIGB. Groups of agency senior executives will also bring a greater business focus to specific matters when required.

The Australian Government Information Management Office (AGIMO), in the Department of Finance and Deregulation plays a key role in driving the efficiency and effectiveness of the Government's use of ICT. AGIMO has a significant role in implementing specific reforms including coordinated ICT procurement, the Gov 2.0 agenda, data centre consolidation and ICT investment management. Building on its lead agency role, including for the adoption of Gov 2.0 across government, AGIMO will collect and analyse information to assist the Government and SIGB in setting future directions.

AGIMO will work with agencies to develop detailed implementation approaches that deliver the strategic priorities and improve productivity. AGIMO will advocate strategies to SIGB and the Government for endorsement.

AGIMO will work closely with stakeholders within and external to government to implement the Vision, including with agency CIOs, the National Security CIO and the Australian Government security community, the Australian Information Commissioner, ICT vendors and ICT industry representative groups, and the third sector.

A small, dedicated program management office in AGIMO will assist SIGB to govern the implementation of the 2011 ICT Strategic Vision. AGIMO will play a critical role in working with agencies and governance boards to ensure that the Vision is delivered.

Appendix: Text descriptions of images

Figure 1: The ICT Strategic Vision

This figure is a visual representation of how the ICT Strategic Vision describes Government use of ICT to improve public sector productivity by:

  • enabling the delivery of world-leading services for Australian people, communities and businesses;

  • supporting open engagement to better inform decisions; and

  • improving the operations of Government.

There are three strategic priorities and six strategic actions outlined in the Vision.

The first strategic priority is to Deliver better services.

  • The external drivers influencing the strategic priority to Deliver better services include increased use of broadband, development of the National Broadband Network, the growing digital economy and changing customer expectations.

  • The strategic actions supporting the strategic priority to Deliver better services are Building capability and Enabling better services.

The second strategic priority is to Engage openly.

  • The external drivers influencing the strategic priority to Engage openly include the Declaration of Open Government, collaborative decision making and increased expectations of government transparency.

  • The strategic actions supporting the strategic priority to Engage openly are Collaborating effectively and Creating knowledge.

The third strategic priority is to Improve Government operations.

  • The external drivers influencing the strategic priority to Improve Government operations include fiscal management requirements, expectations of innovation and the need to ensure efficient, effective and economical use of ICT in government.

  • The strategic actions supporting the strategic priority to Improve Government operations are Investing optimally and Encouraging innovation.

Part VI - Implementing the ICT Vision outlines specific agency and whole-of-government activities and projects that will deliver the Vision.

Figure 2: Alignment of the Strategic Priorities and Strategic Actions

This figure show how the three strategic priorities and six strategic actions of the vision align to support the objective of increased public sector productivity.

  1. The strategic actions aligned to the strategic priority "Deliver better services" are "Building capability" and "Enabling better services".

  2. The strategic actions aligned to the strategic priority "Engage openly" are "Collaborating effectively" and "Creating knowledge".

The strategic actions aligned to the strategic priority "Improve Government operations" are "Investing optimally" and "Encouraging innovation".

1 http://www.oecd.org/document/5/0,3343,en_2649_29964795_35954629_1_1_1_1,00.html (Graph, page 23, Contributions to growth of GDP, 1985-20061 and 2001-2006)

2 References to business include not-for-profit and community organisations

3 http://www.acma.gov.au/WEB/STANDARD/pc=PC_312017

4 http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/strategy-and-governance/ict-reform-program.html

5 http://www.p3m3-officialsite.com/home/home.asp

6 http://www.finance.gov.au/budget/ict-investment-framework/two-pass-review.html

7 http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/review-implementation-ict-reform-program/index.html

8 Productivity Commission (2004), ICT use and Productivity: A Synthesis from Studies of Australian Firms. Productivity Commission Research Paper, Canberra

9 http://www.oecd.org/document/5/0,3343,en_2649_29964795_35954629_1_1_1_1,00.html (Graph, page 23, Contributions to growth of GDP, 1985-20061 and 2001-2006)

10 http://www.oecd.org/document/5/0,3343,en_2649_29964795_35954629_1_1_1_1,00.html (Graph, page 23, Contributions to growth of GDP, 1985-20061 and 2001-2006)

11 http://www.accesseconomics.com.au/

12 http://www.telstraenterprise.com/researchinsights/Pages/TelstraProductivityIndicator.aspx

13 http://www.aph.gov.au/house/committee/economics/Productivity/Report/Final%20Report.pdf

14 http://www.coag.gov.au/coag_meeting_outcomes/2010-09-10/implementation_deregulation_priorities.pdf

15 www.sbr.gov.au

16 http://www.dpmc.gov.au/publications/aga_reform/aga_reform_blueprint/blueprint.cfm

17 http://www.finance.gov.au/e-government/strategy-and-governance/gov2/declaration-of-open-government.html

18 http://gov2.net.au/

19 http://www.finance.gov.au/publications/gov20taskforcereport/summary.htm

20 http://www.budget.gov.au/2010-11/content/myefo/html/index.htm (page 24)

21 http://www.innovation.gov.au/innovationreview/documents/poweringideas_fullreport.pdf

22 http://www.apsc.gov.au/mac/empoweringchange.htm

23 http://is.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pages/ISG/modelling/documents/Brussels29.09.10MeasuringtheImpactofICT.pdf

24 http://www.dbcde.gov.au/digital_economy/future_directions_of_the_digital_economy/australias_digital_economy_future_directions/final_report/australias_digital_economy

25 http://www.aiia.com.au/docs/AIIA%20and%20the%20ICT%20Industry/Green%20IT%20White%20Paper/AIIA%20Low%20Carbon%20Economy.pdf (see page 4)